Using Expert Voices to Determine the Key Components of Positive Behaviour Support for the Development of a National Professional Development and Training Curriculum

ABSTRACT Positive behaviour support (PBS) is a widely adopted model in education and disability services for improving service provision and service user outcomes. However, there is a paucity of guidance to support the formulation and delivery of professional development in PBS across different contexts, including accredited programmes and in‐service training. Thus, this study aimed to address this important gap by developing consensus for the core components of effective professional development and training in PBS, who it is that should receive what training, and how such training might be delivered. A modified Delphi methodology was employed, with an exploration phase (i.e., a narrative review of published literature and an audit of various training courses) and an evaluation phase (i.e., a two‐round online Delphi). Delphi panellists identified core areas of capability with corresponding key competencies for PBS professional development and training. Specific areas in which various stakeholders would benefit most in training were identified. Panellists described a tiered approach to delivering training, from foundation knowledge to more complex skills. Combined, existing literature and course audits, established PBS practice frameworks and expert consensus provide evidence to inform curriculum to deliver professional development and training in PBS for governments and training providers as a step towards formal accreditation of PBS training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70025
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Expert Voices to Determine the Key Components of Positive Behaviour Support for the Development of a National Professional Development and Training Curriculum

Brent A. Hayward, Jeffrey Chan, Keith McVilly, Lisa McKay‐Brown et al.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Using Expert Voices to Determine the Key Components of Positive Behaviour Support for the Development of a National Professional Development and Training Curriculum

Brent A. Hayward, Jeffrey Chan, Keith McVilly, Lisa McKay‐Brown, Mirko Uljarević, Julia R. Hall
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Positive behaviour support (PBS) is a widely adopted model in education and disability services for improving service provision and service user outcomes. However, there is a paucity of guidance to support the formulation and delivery of professional development in PBS across different contexts, including accredited programmes and in‐service training. Thus, this study aimed to address this important gap by developing consensus for the core components of effective professional development and training in PBS, who it is that should receive what training, and how such training might be delivered. A modified Delphi methodology was employed, with an exploration phase (i.e., a narrative review of published literature and an audit of various training courses) and an evaluation phase (i.e., a two‐round online Delphi). Delphi panellists identified core areas of capability with corresponding key competencies for PBS professional development and training. Specific areas in which various stakeholders would benefit most in training were identified. Panellists described a tiered approach to delivering training, from foundation knowledge to more complex skills. Combined, existing literature and course audits, established PBS practice frameworks and expert consensus provide evidence to inform curriculum to deliver professional development and training in PBS for governments and training providers as a step towards formal accreditation of PBS training.

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 22(4)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Stanford Medicine (US), Monash University (AU), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.