Implications of integrating large language models into clinical decision making
Christof & Armoundas explore how large language models (LLMs) can augment clinician-level clinical reasoning across the three pillars-framing the encounter, diagnostic reasoning, and treatment/management-highlighting gains in information synthesis and pattern recognition while underscoring limits that require continuous human judgment and oversight. They advocate a bias-aware, privacy-preserving, and rigorously validated “human-in-the-loop” deployment that safeguards patient agency and clinical accountability, while integrating LLMs into real-world workflows via clear clinician imperatives.
Authors
- Antonis A. Armoundas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-1547)
- Michael Christof (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0840-9095)
Institutions
- Broad Institute (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01216-8
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.23
Funders
- American Heart Association
- National Institutes of Health