NRMP couples match outcomes for internal medicine residents

We found that Couples Match applicants had differing pre-match priorities, significantly less likelihood of matching in their top three programs, and significantly higher perceived levels of stress. Our study highlights the unique needs and stressors of medical students who are applying to internal medicine through the Couples Match. Key messages What is already known on this topic: While the NRMP Couples Match boasts a high overall success rate, little is known about specialty-specific outcomes, applicant satisfaction, or the personal and professional compromises made by couples, particularly within internal medicine. What this study adds: This is the first national study to quantify internal medicine Couples Match outcomes, revealing that these applicants face significantly higher stress, are less likely to match at top-choice programs, and frequently compromise on prestige, geography, and personal priorities to match with their partner. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: These insights underscore the need for tailored advising, informed program recruitment strategies, and potential policy considerations to better support the unique constraints faced by Couples Match applicants-enhancing both resident well-being and match satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf198
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NRMP couples match outcomes for internal medicine residents

Jeanne M. Farnan, Daniel Bujnowski, Ashley Diaz, Armaan Singh
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

NRMP couples match outcomes for internal medicine residents

Jeanne M. Farnan, Daniel Bujnowski, Ashley Diaz, Armaan Singh
article en

Abstract

We found that Couples Match applicants had differing pre-match priorities, significantly less likelihood of matching in their top three programs, and significantly higher perceived levels of stress. Our study highlights the unique needs and stressors of medical students who are applying to internal medicine through the Couples Match. Key messages What is already known on this topic: While the NRMP Couples Match boasts a high overall success rate, little is known about specialty-specific outcomes, applicant satisfaction, or the personal and professional compromises made by couples, particularly within internal medicine. What this study adds: This is the first national study to quantify internal medicine Couples Match outcomes, revealing that these applicants face significantly higher stress, are less likely to match at top-choice programs, and frequently compromise on prestige, geography, and personal priorities to match with their partner. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: These insights underscore the need for tailored advising, informed program recruitment strategies, and potential policy considerations to better support the unique constraints faced by Couples Match applicants-enhancing both resident well-being and match satisfaction.

Postgraduate Medical Journal
University of Chicago (US), Duke University Hospital (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NRMP couples match outcomes for internal medicine residents — Jeanne M. Farnan, Daniel Bujnowski, et al. · Postgraduate Medical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS