Flexible Bronchoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit – the FLEXICARE survey

Background Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a key diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, significant heterogeneity exists regarding indications, peri-procedural management, training, and safety practices across ICUs. Data on real-world practices remain limited. Methods An international, online cross-sectional survey was conducted by the European Respiratory Society's Acute Critical Care Group between May and December 2023. The questionnaire, designed according to CROSS and ACCADEMY standards, targeted healthcare professionals performing FB in ICUs. It addressed procedural protocols, sedation, ventilation strategies, complications, microbiologic sampling, tracheostomy practices, and training. Only fully completed responses were included in the analysis. Results Data from 266 respondents across 73 countries were analysed. Training in FB varied widely: 41% reported no formal training, and only 61% had access to a 24/7 bronchoscopy service. Sedation practices were heterogeneous. Ventilator settings were adjusted differently based on ICU certification, with ICU-certified physicians more likely to reduce PEEP during FB (55% versus 42%; p=0.031). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was the most common sampling method, with a median saline volume of 60–120 mL and a recovery rate of 48±18%. Microbiological findings led to therapeutic changes in 48±21% of cases. FB guidance during percutaneous tracheostomy was applied in only 56% of cases. Conclusion Substantial variability exists in FB practices across ICUs, particularly in training, sedation, ventilation adjustments, and microbiologic sampling. Despite frequent therapeutic consequences, standardised approaches are lacking. These findings underscore the need for international consensus guidelines and structured training programs to harmonise FB practices in critical care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01073-2025
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexible Bronchoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit – the FLEXICARE survey

Claudia Crimi, Ana Cysneiros, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Christian Karagiannidis et al.
ERJ Open Research
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

Flexible Bronchoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit – the FLEXICARE survey

Claudia Crimi, Ana Cysneiros, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Christian Karagiannidis, Marieke L. Duiverman, N Sicker, Christoph Fisser, Ariana Azevedo, João Carlos Winck
article en

Abstract

Background Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a key diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, significant heterogeneity exists regarding indications, peri-procedural management, training, and safety practices across ICUs. Data on real-world practices remain limited. Methods An international, online cross-sectional survey was conducted by the European Respiratory Society's Acute Critical Care Group between May and December 2023. The questionnaire, designed according to CROSS and ACCADEMY standards, targeted healthcare professionals performing FB in ICUs. It addressed procedural protocols, sedation, ventilation strategies, complications, microbiologic sampling, tracheostomy practices, and training. Only fully completed responses were included in the analysis. Results Data from 266 respondents across 73 countries were analysed. Training in FB varied widely: 41% reported no formal training, and only 61% had access to a 24/7 bronchoscopy service. Sedation practices were heterogeneous. Ventilator settings were adjusted differently based on ICU certification, with ICU-certified physicians more likely to reduce PEEP during FB (55% versus 42%; p=0.031). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was the most common sampling method, with a median saline volume of 60–120 mL and a recovery rate of 48±18%. Microbiological findings led to therapeutic changes in 48±21% of cases. FB guidance during percutaneous tracheostomy was applied in only 56% of cases. Conclusion Substantial variability exists in FB practices across ICUs, particularly in training, sedation, ventilation adjustments, and microbiologic sampling. Despite frequent therapeutic consequences, standardised approaches are lacking. These findings underscore the need for international consensus guidelines and structured training programs to harmonise FB practices in critical care settings.

ERJ Open Research
Alkermes (Ireland) (IE), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Universidade do Porto (PT), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), University of Catania (IT), Hospital de São José (PT), Klinik Donaustauf (DE), Dublin Dental University Hospital (IE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.