Sanctions, sales, and stigma: Intermediary online firms’ market role in sustaining trade

In the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, online intermediaries enabled brands to retain a presence in the Russian market as many global companies—presumably or actually—withdrew due to legal and reputational concerns. This paper examines how sales by intermediaries responded to international sanctions. Using novel data on customer transactions of 95 global brands from 1,761 web shops, we show that sales to Russia dropped significantly after the invasion, especially among shops from countries enacting export restrictions. This drop was substantial yet not absolute. Guided by a stylized conceptual framework, we explore which intermediary shops helped sustain sales to Russia, linking their actions to economic incentives and the brand-specific legal and reputational concerns. Overall, we demonstrate how market structure shapes shops’ compliance with sanctions and highlight how economic incentives undermine compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2025.104197
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sanctions, sales, and stigma: Intermediary online firms’ market role in sustaining trade

Krisztina Kis‐Katos, Alexandra Avdeenko, Leonie Reher, Maximilian Kaiser
Journal of International Economics
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Sanctions, sales, and stigma: Intermediary online firms’ market role in sustaining trade

Krisztina Kis‐Katos, Alexandra Avdeenko, Leonie Reher, Maximilian Kaiser
article en

Abstract

In the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, online intermediaries enabled brands to retain a presence in the Russian market as many global companies—presumably or actually—withdrew due to legal and reputational concerns. This paper examines how sales by intermediaries responded to international sanctions. Using novel data on customer transactions of 95 global brands from 1,761 web shops, we show that sales to Russia dropped significantly after the invasion, especially among shops from countries enacting export restrictions. This drop was substantial yet not absolute. Guided by a stylized conceptual framework, we explore which intermediary shops helped sustain sales to Russia, linking their actions to economic incentives and the brand-specific legal and reputational concerns. Overall, we demonstrate how market structure shapes shops’ compliance with sanctions and highlight how economic incentives undermine compliance.

Journal of International EconomicsVol. 159
Universität Hamburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (US), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), World Bank Group (US), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.