Dinosaur skull geometry does not follow functional optimization trends but facilitates adaptability

Dinosaurs exhibited a remarkable array of skull shapes and sizes. However, the geometry of the cranial skeleton and its different functional units (rostrum, orbital region, and braincase) has not been quantified biomechanically. Furthermore, it is unclear if skull evolution followed a trend toward optimization of feeding performance and structural integrity. Here, we used morphometric analyses, theoretical morphospaces, and biomechanical modeling to quantify skull geometry and investigate how skull proportions shaped dinosaur evolution. Our results demonstrate that skull proportions followed a narrowly constrained pattern, with the rostrum showing the largest variability and plasticity. Dinosaur skulls did not evolve toward functional optimality but evolved within a "Goldilocks" zone that represented a compromise of different functions. Broad adaptability of the rostrum may have been beneficial during the transition from non-avian dinosaurs to birds, with the rostrum serving as a focal point for environmental manipulation due to the loss of forelimb function for flight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dinosaur skull geometry does not follow functional optimization trends but facilitates adaptability

Penny Hawkins, G. T. Cowley, A. M. O. Smith, Stephan Lautenschlager et al.
1 citations
iScience
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
4.33
article

Dinosaur skull geometry does not follow functional optimization trends but facilitates adaptability

Penny Hawkins, G. T. Cowley, A. M. O. Smith, Stephan Lautenschlager, Lauren M Steward, Minnie M Cione, Oliver J Graves, Benjamin J Creasy, Helena N Rowlstone, Harrison Everard, Alisa Plaksina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dinosaurs exhibited a remarkable array of skull shapes and sizes. However, the geometry of the cranial skeleton and its different functional units (rostrum, orbital region, and braincase) has not been quantified biomechanically. Furthermore, it is unclear if skull evolution followed a trend toward optimization of feeding performance and structural integrity. Here, we used morphometric analyses, theoretical morphospaces, and biomechanical modeling to quantify skull geometry and investigate how skull proportions shaped dinosaur evolution. Our results demonstrate that skull proportions followed a narrowly constrained pattern, with the rostrum showing the largest variability and plasticity. Dinosaur skulls did not evolve toward functional optimality but evolved within a "Goldilocks" zone that represented a compromise of different functions. Broad adaptability of the rostrum may have been beneficial during the transition from non-avian dinosaurs to birds, with the rostrum serving as a focal point for environmental manipulation due to the loss of forelimb function for flight.

iScienceVol. 28(12)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.