Alternative Fuels’ Techno-Economic and Environmental Impacts on Ship Energy Efficiency with Shaft Generator Integration

This study presents an integrated techno-economic and environmental assessment of shaft generator (SG) integration in marine propulsion systems using alternative fuels. A comprehensive numerical model is developed to simulate the operation of a bulk carrier equipped with a low-speed two-stroke main engine, comparing conventional diesel generator (DG) configurations with SG-powered alternatives under varying ship speeds and auxiliary electrical loads. Three fuel types, heavy fuel oil (HFO), fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), and methanol–diesel dual fuel, are analyzed to evaluate fuel consumption, exhaust emissions, and economic feasibility. The results show that SG integration consistently reduces total fuel consumption by 0.1–0.5 t/day, depending on load and fuel type, yielding annual savings of up to 150 tonnes per vessel. Carbon dioxide (CO2), Nitrogen oxide (NOx), and sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions decrease proportionally with increased SG load, with annual reductions exceeding 450 tonnes of CO2 and up to 15 tonnes of NOx for HFO systems. Methanol–diesel operation achieves the highest relative improvement, with up to 50% lower CO2 and near-zero SOx emissions, despite a moderate increase in total fuel mass due to methanol’s lower calorific value. Economically, SG utilization provides daily fuel cost savings ranging from $200 to $1050, depending on the fuel and load, leading to annual reductions of up to $320,000 for high-load operations. The investment analysis confirms the financial viability of SG installations, with net present values (NPVs) up to $1.4 million, internal rates of return (IRRs) exceeding 100%, and payback periods below one year at 600 kW load. The results highlight the dual benefit of SG technology, enhancing energy efficiency and supporting IMO decarbonization goals, particularly when coupled with low-carbon fuels such as methanol. The developed computational framework provides a practical decision-support tool for ship designers and operators to quantify SG performance, optimize energy management, and evaluate the long-term economic and environmental trade-offs of fuel transition pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18226070
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative Fuels’ Techno-Economic and Environmental Impacts on Ship Energy Efficiency with Shaft Generator Integration

Mina Y. Tadros, Evangelos K. Boulougouris, Antonios Michail Ypsilantis, Vasileios Sakellis et al.
2 citations
Energies
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
1.60
article

Alternative Fuels’ Techno-Economic and Environmental Impacts on Ship Energy Efficiency with Shaft Generator Integration

Mina Y. Tadros, Evangelos K. Boulougouris, Antonios Michail Ypsilantis, Vasileios Sakellis, Nicolas Hadjioannou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study presents an integrated techno-economic and environmental assessment of shaft generator (SG) integration in marine propulsion systems using alternative fuels. A comprehensive numerical model is developed to simulate the operation of a bulk carrier equipped with a low-speed two-stroke main engine, comparing conventional diesel generator (DG) configurations with SG-powered alternatives under varying ship speeds and auxiliary electrical loads. Three fuel types, heavy fuel oil (HFO), fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), and methanol–diesel dual fuel, are analyzed to evaluate fuel consumption, exhaust emissions, and economic feasibility. The results show that SG integration consistently reduces total fuel consumption by 0.1–0.5 t/day, depending on load and fuel type, yielding annual savings of up to 150 tonnes per vessel. Carbon dioxide (CO2), Nitrogen oxide (NOx), and sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions decrease proportionally with increased SG load, with annual reductions exceeding 450 tonnes of CO2 and up to 15 tonnes of NOx for HFO systems. Methanol–diesel operation achieves the highest relative improvement, with up to 50% lower CO2 and near-zero SOx emissions, despite a moderate increase in total fuel mass due to methanol’s lower calorific value. Economically, SG utilization provides daily fuel cost savings ranging from $200 to $1050, depending on the fuel and load, leading to annual reductions of up to $320,000 for high-load operations. The investment analysis confirms the financial viability of SG installations, with net present values (NPVs) up to $1.4 million, internal rates of return (IRRs) exceeding 100%, and payback periods below one year at 600 kW load. The results highlight the dual benefit of SG technology, enhancing energy efficiency and supporting IMO decarbonization goals, particularly when coupled with low-carbon fuels such as methanol. The developed computational framework provides a practical decision-support tool for ship designers and operators to quantify SG performance, optimize energy management, and evaluate the long-term economic and environmental trade-offs of fuel transition pathways.

EnergiesVol. 18(22)
International University of Monaco (MC), University of Strathclyde (GB), School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (GR), Scientific Centre of Monaco (MC), Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.