The Influence of Pedicle Screw Compression Direction on Lumbar Lordosis in Fusion Surgery

Study Design: A prospective, crossover clinical study. Objective: To evaluate whether the direction of pedicle screw compression influences segmental lordosis in lumbar fusion surgery and validate previous in vitro biomechanical findings in a clinical setting. Summary of Background Data: Restoring sagittal balance is crucial in lumbar fusion surgery to prevent adjacent segment degeneration and mechanical complications. Previous biomechanical studies have suggested that the sequence of screw locking and compression may significantly impact the degree of lordosis achieved. However, these findings have not been systematically tested in a clinical setting. Methods: A total of 20 patients undergoing 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion at 2 institutions were enrolled. Each patient was subjected to 2 different compression techniques in a randomized order. In Method A (conventional technique), the caudal screw was locked first, and compression proceeded cranially. In Method B, the cranial screw was locked first, and compression proceeded caudally. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images were analyzed to measure the change in lordotic angle before and after compression. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the lordotic gain between the 2 methods. Results: The mean lordotic gain with Method A was 3.85 degrees (range: 1–7 degrees), while Method B resulted in a significantly greater mean gain of 6.02 degrees (range: 3–12 degrees), representing a 56.3% increase ( P <0.001). Method B produced greater lordosis in 18 of 20 cases, with no difference observed in 2 cases. Conclusions: This study confirms that the sequence of pedicle screw compression significantly influences lordosis gained during lumbar fusion surgery. Locking the cranial screw first and compressing caudally (Method B) resulted in superior lordotic restoration. These findings provide a simple, intraoperative technique to enhance sagittal alignment, potentially improving long-term surgical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001954
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Pedicle Screw Compression Direction on Lumbar Lordosis in Fusion Surgery

Shay Menachem, Kevin Seex
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

The Influence of Pedicle Screw Compression Direction on Lumbar Lordosis in Fusion Surgery

Shay Menachem, Kevin Seex
article en

Abstract

Study Design: A prospective, crossover clinical study. Objective: To evaluate whether the direction of pedicle screw compression influences segmental lordosis in lumbar fusion surgery and validate previous in vitro biomechanical findings in a clinical setting. Summary of Background Data: Restoring sagittal balance is crucial in lumbar fusion surgery to prevent adjacent segment degeneration and mechanical complications. Previous biomechanical studies have suggested that the sequence of screw locking and compression may significantly impact the degree of lordosis achieved. However, these findings have not been systematically tested in a clinical setting. Methods: A total of 20 patients undergoing 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion at 2 institutions were enrolled. Each patient was subjected to 2 different compression techniques in a randomized order. In Method A (conventional technique), the caudal screw was locked first, and compression proceeded cranially. In Method B, the cranial screw was locked first, and compression proceeded caudally. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images were analyzed to measure the change in lordotic angle before and after compression. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the lordotic gain between the 2 methods. Results: The mean lordotic gain with Method A was 3.85 degrees (range: 1–7 degrees), while Method B resulted in a significantly greater mean gain of 6.02 degrees (range: 3–12 degrees), representing a 56.3% increase ( P <0.001). Method B produced greater lordosis in 18 of 20 cases, with no difference observed in 2 cases. Conclusions: This study confirms that the sequence of pedicle screw compression significantly influences lordosis gained during lumbar fusion surgery. Locking the cranial screw first and compressing caudally (Method B) resulted in superior lordotic restoration. These findings provide a simple, intraoperative technique to enhance sagittal alignment, potentially improving long-term surgical outcomes.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.