Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with various hearing configurations

Auditory grouping relies on the ability to bind tones with coherent spectral features over time to form auditory objects. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) degrades spectral resolution, and the extent of this degradation varies with the hearing configuration. However, it remains unclear how SNHL impacts auditory grouping and whether different hearing configurations affect this ability. This study investigated task performance and cortical activity during auditory object detection in four groups with different hearing configurations: Twenty normal-hearing (NH) listeners, seventeen bilateral hearing aid users with acoustic-only stimulation (A-only), thirty-one cochlear implant (CI) users with acoustic and electric stimulation (A + E), and seventeen bilateral CI users with electric-only stimulation (E-only). While electroencephalography was recorded, participants performed a stochastic figure-ground task requiring the detection of spectrally and temporally coherent tone pips embedded in a background of random-frequency tone clouds. Sensitivity to the task was high across groups, although CI groups showed poorer performance compared to NH and A-only groups. Relative to NH listeners, the object-related evoked responses were weaker in A-only listeners and absent in CI groups. Delta (2-3.5 Hz) and theta (4-7 Hz) event-related synchronization to the auditory objects were only observed in the NH group, except for the A + E group, which showed a delta synchronization. However, all groups exhibited alpha (8-15 Hz) and beta (17-30 Hz) event-related desynchronization, with no significant group differences. Notably, individual differences in alpha and beta desynchronization predicted task sensitivity. These findings suggest that alpha and beta cortical activity, measured during an auditory object detection task, reflects auditory grouping in any hearing configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121597
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with various hearing configurations

Inyong Choi, Nour Alsabbagh, Joel I. Berger, Kyogu Lee et al.
NeuroImage
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Cortical oscillations predict auditory grouping in listeners with various hearing configurations

Inyong Choi, Nour Alsabbagh, Joel I. Berger, Kyogu Lee, Phillip E. Gander, Timothy D. Griffiths, Bob McMurray
article en

Abstract

Auditory grouping relies on the ability to bind tones with coherent spectral features over time to form auditory objects. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) degrades spectral resolution, and the extent of this degradation varies with the hearing configuration. However, it remains unclear how SNHL impacts auditory grouping and whether different hearing configurations affect this ability. This study investigated task performance and cortical activity during auditory object detection in four groups with different hearing configurations: Twenty normal-hearing (NH) listeners, seventeen bilateral hearing aid users with acoustic-only stimulation (A-only), thirty-one cochlear implant (CI) users with acoustic and electric stimulation (A + E), and seventeen bilateral CI users with electric-only stimulation (E-only). While electroencephalography was recorded, participants performed a stochastic figure-ground task requiring the detection of spectrally and temporally coherent tone pips embedded in a background of random-frequency tone clouds. Sensitivity to the task was high across groups, although CI groups showed poorer performance compared to NH and A-only groups. Relative to NH listeners, the object-related evoked responses were weaker in A-only listeners and absent in CI groups. Delta (2-3.5 Hz) and theta (4-7 Hz) event-related synchronization to the auditory objects were only observed in the NH group, except for the A + E group, which showed a delta synchronization. However, all groups exhibited alpha (8-15 Hz) and beta (17-30 Hz) event-related desynchronization, with no significant group differences. Notably, individual differences in alpha and beta desynchronization predicted task sensitivity. These findings suggest that alpha and beta cortical activity, measured during an auditory object detection task, reflects auditory grouping in any hearing configuration.

NeuroImageVol. 323
University of Iowa (US), Seoul National University (KR), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.