Measuring impact of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres: Co-developing a theory of change and minimum dataset for Alberta Child and Youth Advocacy Centres

There is an urgent need to demonstrate the immediate and long-term outcomes for Child and Youth Advocacy Centres (CYACs) and the vulnerable children and youth they serve through ongoing evaluation and research. Collecting and using high-quality data helps CYACs improve services, strengthen program design, and make informed decisions about child abuse prevention, investigation, and response. When consistent data is collected across CYACs it reveals child abuse trends, highlights areas for program improvement, and identifies gaps in understanding of child abuse. CYACs can leverage outcome data to advocate for environmental change and influence policies to improve outcomes for children and youth impacted by child abuse. The Alberta Network of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres worked together to establish a minimum dataset for CYACs. This collaborative effort was born out of a shared vision that by strengthening and establishing consistent approaches to data collection, they could collectively impact the model to continue providing responsive services to the children and youth they serve. In this discussion article we present the co-developed theory of change, minimum dataset and core outcomes to support CYACs in robust impact measurement. • Using data helps Child and Youth Advocacy Centres improve services and advocate for better outcomes. By collecting and analyzing data, Child and Youth Advocacy Centres can spot trends, identify gaps, and make informed decisions that enhance support for children and youth affected by abuse. • Child and Youth Advocacy Centres rely on five key foundational enablers to deliver coordinated, multi-system response. These foundational enablers promote an integrated approach to essential services: that is, collaborative case review, child forensic interviews, medical care, mental health support, and victim supports and systems. • A shared framework helps Child and Youth Advocacy Centres measure impact and improve services. A co-developed theory of change, along with a core dataset and outcomes, enables Child and Youth Advocacy Centres to track progress and adapt to the needs of children and youth. • Rolling out the dataset requires thoughtful planning at all levels. Successfully using the minimum dataset depends on careful coordination across both provincial and local Child and Youth Advocacy Centres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100263
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring impact of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres: Co-developing a theory of change and minimum dataset for Alberta Child and Youth Advocacy Centres

Gina Dimitropoulos, Olivia Cullen, Naomi J. Parker, Janine Elenko et al.
Child Protection and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Measuring impact of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres: Co-developing a theory of change and minimum dataset for Alberta Child and Youth Advocacy Centres

Gina Dimitropoulos, Olivia Cullen, Naomi J. Parker, Janine Elenko, Jennifer McAlpine
article en

Abstract

There is an urgent need to demonstrate the immediate and long-term outcomes for Child and Youth Advocacy Centres (CYACs) and the vulnerable children and youth they serve through ongoing evaluation and research. Collecting and using high-quality data helps CYACs improve services, strengthen program design, and make informed decisions about child abuse prevention, investigation, and response. When consistent data is collected across CYACs it reveals child abuse trends, highlights areas for program improvement, and identifies gaps in understanding of child abuse. CYACs can leverage outcome data to advocate for environmental change and influence policies to improve outcomes for children and youth impacted by child abuse. The Alberta Network of Child and Youth Advocacy Centres worked together to establish a minimum dataset for CYACs. This collaborative effort was born out of a shared vision that by strengthening and establishing consistent approaches to data collection, they could collectively impact the model to continue providing responsive services to the children and youth they serve. In this discussion article we present the co-developed theory of change, minimum dataset and core outcomes to support CYACs in robust impact measurement. • Using data helps Child and Youth Advocacy Centres improve services and advocate for better outcomes. By collecting and analyzing data, Child and Youth Advocacy Centres can spot trends, identify gaps, and make informed decisions that enhance support for children and youth affected by abuse. • Child and Youth Advocacy Centres rely on five key foundational enablers to deliver coordinated, multi-system response. These foundational enablers promote an integrated approach to essential services: that is, collaborative case review, child forensic interviews, medical care, mental health support, and victim supports and systems. • A shared framework helps Child and Youth Advocacy Centres measure impact and improve services. A co-developed theory of change, along with a core dataset and outcomes, enables Child and Youth Advocacy Centres to track progress and adapt to the needs of children and youth. • Rolling out the dataset requires thoughtful planning at all levels. Successfully using the minimum dataset depends on careful coordination across both provincial and local Child and Youth Advocacy Centres.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 7
University of Calgary (CA), Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.