Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes

In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, precise positioning of the glenoid baseplate is essential for optimizing biomechanics and implant longevity. This narrative review introduces modern guidance modalities (patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and augmented reality intraoperative navigation) and compares available literature on implant alignment accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Although patient-specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation consistently improve alignment with preoperative plans and reduce errors in guide pin and screw placement, short-term measures of strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes are similar to those achieved with conventional freehand methods. However, guided approaches demonstrate a reduction in the risk of complications in the short term. This suggests that the primary clinical advantage of these modern techniques is reducing complications and potentially improving long-term implant outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100615
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes

Yamac Akgün, Ayham Jaber, Alp Paksoy, Doruk Akgün et al.
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes

Yamac Akgün, Ayham Jaber, Alp Paksoy, Doruk Akgün, Andrea Estfeller
article en

Abstract

In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, precise positioning of the glenoid baseplate is essential for optimizing biomechanics and implant longevity. This narrative review introduces modern guidance modalities (patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and augmented reality intraoperative navigation) and compares available literature on implant alignment accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Although patient-specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation consistently improve alignment with preoperative plans and reduce errors in guide pin and screw placement, short-term measures of strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes are similar to those achieved with conventional freehand methods. However, guided approaches demonstrate a reduction in the risk of complications in the short term. This suggests that the primary clinical advantage of these modern techniques is reducing complications and potentially improving long-term implant outcomes.

JSES Reviews Reports and TechniquesVol. 6(1)
University of Miami (US), Steadman Clinic (US), Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.