Exploring the Braess Paradox: Static Versus Dynamic Assignment

The Braess paradox is a well-known phenomenon initially observed in road traffic flow. It points out that increasing network capacity can lead to poorer performance in congested situations, when the drivers attempt to optimise their travel time individually. This paradox is not limited to road transport, but also extends to various information networks. In this article, we examine the Braess paradox in a closed network where demand remains constant. First, we determine the user and global optima of the deterministic system in stationary states with flow balancing. We present explicit formulae for the density intervals at which the Braess paradox occurs. We then compute Monte Carlo simulations of a stochastic mesoscopic traffic model using aggregate data obtained from a queueing model to explore the results. Static assignment models match the deterministic stationary results. In addition, the simulations assess the effectiveness of dynamic assignment, whereby drivers select routes in real time to minimise travel time. Interestingly, behaviour with dynamic assignment deviates from the generic static assignment results, particularly in highly congested situations. These results emphasise the significance of dynamic route selection in relation to Braess's paradox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collective Dynamics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2025.190
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Braess Paradox: Static Versus Dynamic Assignment

Antoine Tordeux, Sylvain Lassarre, Andreas Schadschneider
Collective Dynamics
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Exploring the Braess Paradox: Static Versus Dynamic Assignment

Antoine Tordeux, Sylvain Lassarre, Andreas Schadschneider
article en

Abstract

The Braess paradox is a well-known phenomenon initially observed in road traffic flow. It points out that increasing network capacity can lead to poorer performance in congested situations, when the drivers attempt to optimise their travel time individually. This paradox is not limited to road transport, but also extends to various information networks. In this article, we examine the Braess paradox in a closed network where demand remains constant. First, we determine the user and global optima of the deterministic system in stationary states with flow balancing. We present explicit formulae for the density intervals at which the Braess paradox occurs. We then compute Monte Carlo simulations of a stochastic mesoscopic traffic model using aggregate data obtained from a queueing model to explore the results. Static assignment models match the deterministic stationary results. In addition, the simulations assess the effectiveness of dynamic assignment, whereby drivers select routes in real time to minimise travel time. Interestingly, behaviour with dynamic assignment deviates from the generic static assignment results, particularly in highly congested situations. These results emphasise the significance of dynamic route selection in relation to Braess's paradox.

Collective DynamicsVol. 10
University of Wuppertal (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Braess Paradox: Static Versus Dynamic Assignment — Antoine Tordeux, Sylvain Lassarre, et al. · Collective Dynamics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS