A Focused look at spatial assessment in Technology & Engineering education

This systematic scoping review examines the application of spatial assessment tools within Technology and Engineering (T& E) education, evaluating their capacity to capture the multifaceted nature of spatial reasoning required in these domains. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on standardised instruments that assess isolated spatial abilities, thereby neglecting broader competencies such as large-scale and embodied spatial reasoning fundamental to T& E practice. Furthermore, the review identifies persistent gender-related disparities and structural biases embedded within current assessment frameworks, which may perpetuate inequities and constrain participation among underrepresented groups, particularly women. By synthesising evidence from peer-reviewed literature, the study underscores the limitations of prevailing assessment paradigms and advocates for the development of more comprehensive, contextually situated instruments. Such approaches are essential to advancing equity, fostering inclusive educational practices, and aligning spatial assessment more closely with the cognitive and practical demands of contemporary T& E education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2572027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Focused look at spatial assessment in Technology & Engineering education

Diarmaid Lane, David A. Tanner, R. M. Cole, Meryn McNea
1 citations
European Journal of Engineering Education
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
article

A Focused look at spatial assessment in Technology & Engineering education

Diarmaid Lane, David A. Tanner, R. M. Cole, Meryn McNea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This systematic scoping review examines the application of spatial assessment tools within Technology and Engineering (T& E) education, evaluating their capacity to capture the multifaceted nature of spatial reasoning required in these domains. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on standardised instruments that assess isolated spatial abilities, thereby neglecting broader competencies such as large-scale and embodied spatial reasoning fundamental to T& E practice. Furthermore, the review identifies persistent gender-related disparities and structural biases embedded within current assessment frameworks, which may perpetuate inequities and constrain participation among underrepresented groups, particularly women. By synthesising evidence from peer-reviewed literature, the study underscores the limitations of prevailing assessment paradigms and advocates for the development of more comprehensive, contextually situated instruments. Such approaches are essential to advancing equity, fostering inclusive educational practices, and aligning spatial assessment more closely with the cognitive and practical demands of contemporary T& E education.

European Journal of Engineering Education
University of Limerick (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Focused look at spatial assessment in Technology & Engineering education — Diarmaid Lane, David A. Tanner, et al. · European Journal of Engineering Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS