Reforms and in-work poverty in the EU

While employment protects most EU residents from economic hardship, a growing share of workers nonetheless experience in-work poverty or material deprivation. This reflects a complex interplay of factors, including work intensity, job quality, household composition, and the institutional context. This paper investigates how changes in policy and institutional frameworks affect in-work poverty. Using EU-SILC cross-sectional data, we construct a dataset at the demographic group level (by gender, age, education, and country) for 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2018. We examine the impact of reforms in the following domains: family policy, labour market institutions, social protection, and product market regulation. Our findings highlight the key role of family policies - especially those addressing the presence of children - in reducing in-work poverty, primarily through increases in both work intensity and labour income. By contrast, reforms in labour market institutions, social protection, and competition policy appear to play only a secondary role. • This paper investigates how changes in policy and institutional frameworks affect in-work poverty across 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2018. • We examine the impact of reforms in the following domains: family policy, labour market institutions, and social protection and product market regulation. • Our findings highlight the central role of family policy—especially those addressing the presence of children—in reducing in-work poverty, primarily through increases in both work intensity and labour income. • By contrast, reforms in labour market institutions, social protection, and competition policy appear to play only a secondary role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Systems
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2025.101361
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforms and in-work poverty in the EU

Cristiano Perugini, Fabrizio Pompei
Economic Systems
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Reforms and in-work poverty in the EU

Cristiano Perugini, Fabrizio Pompei
article en

Abstract

While employment protects most EU residents from economic hardship, a growing share of workers nonetheless experience in-work poverty or material deprivation. This reflects a complex interplay of factors, including work intensity, job quality, household composition, and the institutional context. This paper investigates how changes in policy and institutional frameworks affect in-work poverty. Using EU-SILC cross-sectional data, we construct a dataset at the demographic group level (by gender, age, education, and country) for 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2018. We examine the impact of reforms in the following domains: family policy, labour market institutions, social protection, and product market regulation. Our findings highlight the key role of family policies - especially those addressing the presence of children - in reducing in-work poverty, primarily through increases in both work intensity and labour income. By contrast, reforms in labour market institutions, social protection, and competition policy appear to play only a secondary role. • This paper investigates how changes in policy and institutional frameworks affect in-work poverty across 25 EU member states from 2006 to 2018. • We examine the impact of reforms in the following domains: family policy, labour market institutions, and social protection and product market regulation. • Our findings highlight the central role of family policy—especially those addressing the presence of children—in reducing in-work poverty, primarily through increases in both work intensity and labour income. • By contrast, reforms in labour market institutions, social protection, and competition policy appear to play only a secondary role.

Economic Systems
University of Perugia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.