Impact of assistive technologies on caregiver burden and perseverance for people with dementia at home

• AT use was limited and AT type used varied by caregiver living arrangement. • Most used ATs: daily living support and risk prevention; risk response least used. • Daily living support ATs linked to fewer care hours. • Risk prevention ATs tied to longer PT, higher CarerQol-7D, and lower SRB scores. • Daily support and risk response ATs most likely to extend PT by over six months. This study examines the relationship between the use of assistive technologies and the burden and perseverance time of informal caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia. An online survey of 342 informal caregivers in the Netherlands assessed objective burden (tasks and time involved in caregiving), subjective burden (personal experience of stress and strain), current perseverance time (time expected to be able to continue providing care), and well-being (overall happiness). Data included demographics, housing, neighbourhood characteristics, assistive technology use, and preferences for additional technologies. Multiple logistic regressions examined associations between assistive technology categories and caregiver outcomes (i.e., below-median weekly caregiving hours, Self-Rated Burden score; above-median CarerQol-7D score, CarerQol-VAS score, and Current Perseverance Time in months). Furthermore, multiple logistic regressions estimated the impact of the most desired technology category on the likelihood of extending the perseverance time by more than six months. Analyses were stratified by caregiver living arrangement (co-residing vs living nearby). Among co-residing caregivers, daily living support technologies were associated with reduced caregiving hours, whereas risk prevention technologies were linked to longer current perseverance time but also higher self-rated burden. Risk response technologies were also associated with higher self-rated burden. Among caregivers living nearby, risk prevention technologies were associated with higher quality of life. Moreover, daily living support and risk response technologies most strongly extended perseverance time beyond six months in both groups. Assistive technologies play a nuanced role in supporting informal caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia, with impacts differing by living arrangement and technology type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Technology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101134
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of assistive technologies on caregiver burden and perseverance for people with dementia at home

Job van Exel, G Bagnasco
Health Policy and Technology
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Impact of assistive technologies on caregiver burden and perseverance for people with dementia at home

Job van Exel, G Bagnasco
article en

Abstract

• AT use was limited and AT type used varied by caregiver living arrangement. • Most used ATs: daily living support and risk prevention; risk response least used. • Daily living support ATs linked to fewer care hours. • Risk prevention ATs tied to longer PT, higher CarerQol-7D, and lower SRB scores. • Daily support and risk response ATs most likely to extend PT by over six months. This study examines the relationship between the use of assistive technologies and the burden and perseverance time of informal caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia. An online survey of 342 informal caregivers in the Netherlands assessed objective burden (tasks and time involved in caregiving), subjective burden (personal experience of stress and strain), current perseverance time (time expected to be able to continue providing care), and well-being (overall happiness). Data included demographics, housing, neighbourhood characteristics, assistive technology use, and preferences for additional technologies. Multiple logistic regressions examined associations between assistive technology categories and caregiver outcomes (i.e., below-median weekly caregiving hours, Self-Rated Burden score; above-median CarerQol-7D score, CarerQol-VAS score, and Current Perseverance Time in months). Furthermore, multiple logistic regressions estimated the impact of the most desired technology category on the likelihood of extending the perseverance time by more than six months. Analyses were stratified by caregiver living arrangement (co-residing vs living nearby). Among co-residing caregivers, daily living support technologies were associated with reduced caregiving hours, whereas risk prevention technologies were linked to longer current perseverance time but also higher self-rated burden. Risk response technologies were also associated with higher self-rated burden. Among caregivers living nearby, risk prevention technologies were associated with higher quality of life. Moreover, daily living support and risk response technologies most strongly extended perseverance time beyond six months in both groups. Assistive technologies play a nuanced role in supporting informal caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia, with impacts differing by living arrangement and technology type.

Health Policy and TechnologyVol. 15(1)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.