Disparities in wildfire regimes across China's borders: Policy-driven asymmetries in fire frequency, intensity and impact

Border zones between countries are among the world regions with large spatial variability in wildfires. However, our understanding of fire regimes in these areas, particularly quantitative assessments of cross-border fire risk, remains limited. This study examines fire regimes and their driving factors along China's extensive land borders, which encompass the world's longest border and the second-highest number of neighboring countries. Utilizing Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiomete satellite products, we analyzed fire occurrence (fire count), intensity (fire radiative power), and impact (burned area) within 50-km buffer zones on both sides of the border, their relationships with vegetation, and the statistical differences across borders. The results indicate that approximately 10% of China's land border areas face threats from cross-border fires, primarily originating from Russia, Mongolia, and Laos. The wildfire metrics in neighboring countries—notably the fire count and cumulative FRP in Russia, Myanmar, and Laos and the total burned area in Mongolia and Russia—were significantly greater than those in China. However, the differences in vegetation between inside and outside the borders were not significant. The results suggest that the fire disparities were primarily driven by divergent fire management policies and resource allocation. We argue that effective mitigation of transboundary fire risk requires an integrated approach that combines regional governance, targeted prevention measures, and strengthened international cooperation. Quantifying policy-driven disparities in fire regimes provides a critical baseline for coordinated management in global border hotspots. • Policy divergence - China's strict suppression vs neighbors' permissive use; • Foreign-side FN, FRP, BA: 7.62×, 9.89×, 7.40× Chinese-side values; • About 10% of China’s border has experienced cross-border fires; • Main fire-source regions: Russia, Mongolia, Myanmar, and Laos; • Bilateral 50-km buffer framework enables spatially explicit comparison.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105922
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in wildfire regimes across China's borders: Policy-driven asymmetries in fire frequency, intensity and impact

Weike Li, Liqing Si, Mingyu Wang, Yongqiang Liu et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
article

Disparities in wildfire regimes across China's borders: Policy-driven asymmetries in fire frequency, intensity and impact

Weike Li, Liqing Si, Mingyu Wang, Yongqiang Liu, Lifu Shu, Kunfang Yan, Fengjun Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Border zones between countries are among the world regions with large spatial variability in wildfires. However, our understanding of fire regimes in these areas, particularly quantitative assessments of cross-border fire risk, remains limited. This study examines fire regimes and their driving factors along China's extensive land borders, which encompass the world's longest border and the second-highest number of neighboring countries. Utilizing Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiomete satellite products, we analyzed fire occurrence (fire count), intensity (fire radiative power), and impact (burned area) within 50-km buffer zones on both sides of the border, their relationships with vegetation, and the statistical differences across borders. The results indicate that approximately 10% of China's land border areas face threats from cross-border fires, primarily originating from Russia, Mongolia, and Laos. The wildfire metrics in neighboring countries—notably the fire count and cumulative FRP in Russia, Myanmar, and Laos and the total burned area in Mongolia and Russia—were significantly greater than those in China. However, the differences in vegetation between inside and outside the borders were not significant. The results suggest that the fire disparities were primarily driven by divergent fire management policies and resource allocation. We argue that effective mitigation of transboundary fire risk requires an integrated approach that combines regional governance, targeted prevention measures, and strengthened international cooperation. Quantifying policy-driven disparities in fire regimes provides a critical baseline for coordinated management in global border hotspots. • Policy divergence - China's strict suppression vs neighbors' permissive use; • Foreign-side FN, FRP, BA: 7.62×, 9.89×, 7.40× Chinese-side values; • About 10% of China’s border has experienced cross-border fires; • Main fire-source regions: Russia, Mongolia, Myanmar, and Laos; • Bilateral 50-km buffer framework enables spatially explicit comparison.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 131
US Forest Service (US), Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.