Eco-design strategies for household cooking appliances via life cycle assessment and Delphi study

Domestic cooking devices have truly profound sustainable design challenges across high energy use, dependency on critical raw materials, and poor management at end of life. Recent studies failed to systematically convert environmental diagnoses into prioritized design options for a wide range of cooking technologies. This study bridges this gap through an integrated mixed-methods framework combining a cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with a three-round Delphi expert panel. The LCA, conducted for gas, biogas, induction, and halogen hobs under different scenarios adopted a per-meal scalable functional unit while reporting full lifecycle impacts, enabling both granular and systemic comparisons. Results from the LCA revealed pronounced environmental trade-offs: induction hobs exhibited the lowest carbon footprint (1619 kg CO₂-eq) and energy demand (19,368 MJ), yet incurred the highest human toxicity (0.0011 CTUh) and resource scarcity impacts due to electronics and rare-earth components. Halogen hobs offered a balanced profile, approaching 90 % of induction’s efficiency with significantly lower material toxicity. Biogas systems reduced GHG emissions by 59 % compared to conventional gas hobs but required 40 % more maintenance. Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) confirmed the statistical robustness of these rankings, while sensitivity analysis highlighted that end-of-life scenarios had minimal influence on global warming potential (<0.5 % change) and industrial waste (5–7 % variability). Based on the iterative involvement of experts, the 15 circular design strategies were developed and ranked; like (1) ferrite-core induction coils to avoid the use of rare earths, (2) self-regulating biogas nozzles for optimal combustion, (3) retrofit biogas conversion modules for dual-fuel operation, (4) photocatalytic biogas purifiers to mitigate toxic emissions, (5) graded porosity 3D-printed housings for reducing weight, (6) AR-supported maintenance interfaces and (7) closed-loop aluminum casting to reduce the consumption of virgin material. These strategies combined address the main lifecycle hotspots (material substitution, smart operation and design for disassembly), providing manufacturers with a generalizable roadmap. This study highlights that a context-driven, strategy-based redesign rather than incremental upgrades is needed to adapt household cooking technologies to circular economy principles. By converting quantitative environmental profiling into expert-validated design interventions, this paper demonstrates a decision-support framework that can be reproduced flexibly to inform sustainable innovation of appliances. • Conducting a comprehensive cradle-to-grave LCA comparing four hob technologies: gas, biogas, induction, and halogen. • A mixed-methods applied of quantitative LCA with qualitative expert Delphi panels for bridging a critical research gap. • A Monte-Carlo simulation has been applied to normalize the data and approve the reliability of results. • Sensitivity analysis of End-of-life management scenarios including landfill vs recycling. • Prioritizing 15 expert-validated circular design strategies based on the LCA to mitigate environmental overall impacts of the products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Research
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2025.11.005
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-design strategies for household cooking appliances via life cycle assessment and Delphi study

Seyed Ali Faregh, Bahram Ipaki, Gholamreza Moaddeli
Journal of Engineering Research
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Eco-design strategies for household cooking appliances via life cycle assessment and Delphi study

Seyed Ali Faregh, Bahram Ipaki, Gholamreza Moaddeli
article en

Abstract

Domestic cooking devices have truly profound sustainable design challenges across high energy use, dependency on critical raw materials, and poor management at end of life. Recent studies failed to systematically convert environmental diagnoses into prioritized design options for a wide range of cooking technologies. This study bridges this gap through an integrated mixed-methods framework combining a cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with a three-round Delphi expert panel. The LCA, conducted for gas, biogas, induction, and halogen hobs under different scenarios adopted a per-meal scalable functional unit while reporting full lifecycle impacts, enabling both granular and systemic comparisons. Results from the LCA revealed pronounced environmental trade-offs: induction hobs exhibited the lowest carbon footprint (1619 kg CO₂-eq) and energy demand (19,368 MJ), yet incurred the highest human toxicity (0.0011 CTUh) and resource scarcity impacts due to electronics and rare-earth components. Halogen hobs offered a balanced profile, approaching 90 % of induction’s efficiency with significantly lower material toxicity. Biogas systems reduced GHG emissions by 59 % compared to conventional gas hobs but required 40 % more maintenance. Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) confirmed the statistical robustness of these rankings, while sensitivity analysis highlighted that end-of-life scenarios had minimal influence on global warming potential (<0.5 % change) and industrial waste (5–7 % variability). Based on the iterative involvement of experts, the 15 circular design strategies were developed and ranked; like (1) ferrite-core induction coils to avoid the use of rare earths, (2) self-regulating biogas nozzles for optimal combustion, (3) retrofit biogas conversion modules for dual-fuel operation, (4) photocatalytic biogas purifiers to mitigate toxic emissions, (5) graded porosity 3D-printed housings for reducing weight, (6) AR-supported maintenance interfaces and (7) closed-loop aluminum casting to reduce the consumption of virgin material. These strategies combined address the main lifecycle hotspots (material substitution, smart operation and design for disassembly), providing manufacturers with a generalizable roadmap. This study highlights that a context-driven, strategy-based redesign rather than incremental upgrades is needed to adapt household cooking technologies to circular economy principles. By converting quantitative environmental profiling into expert-validated design interventions, this paper demonstrates a decision-support framework that can be reproduced flexibly to inform sustainable innovation of appliances. • Conducting a comprehensive cradle-to-grave LCA comparing four hob technologies: gas, biogas, induction, and halogen. • A mixed-methods applied of quantitative LCA with qualitative expert Delphi panels for bridging a critical research gap. • A Monte-Carlo simulation has been applied to normalize the data and approve the reliability of results. • Sensitivity analysis of End-of-life management scenarios including landfill vs recycling. • Prioritizing 15 expert-validated circular design strategies based on the LCA to mitigate environmental overall impacts of the products.

Journal of Engineering Research
Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center (IR), Tabriz Islamic Arts University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.