Current Status of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Surgery in Italy Part 2: National Survey on a 5-Year Period 2020–2025

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Following a previous study focused on the status of robotic surgery in Italy in 2020, we aimed to present the updated study reflecting data up to 2025. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> An online questionnaire has been sent to robotic pediatric centers in Italy. The duration of robotic activity, the number of surgeons performing robot-assisted surgery (RAS), the modality of training, volume, type, and outcome of RAS in each participating center have been collected and analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The number of centers practicing robotic surgery in Italy increased by 55.5% rate. All 14 centers adopted the Da Vinci Intuitive console. Three out of 14 centers have a dedicated console, while 11 out of 14 centers share the robotic platform with adult surgeons. Nine out of 14 centers routinely adopted a fourth 5-mm laparoscopic trocar for the bedside surgeon. About 1105 robotic procedures have been performed, the majority were still urological (46.7%). The others were gastrointestinal 18%, oncological 17.1%, gynecological 10.9%, and thoracic 3.6%. The rest (3.7%) were considered varia. All centers prefer to operate patients weighing more than 10-15 kg. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Robotic pediatric activity in Italy has had an important development in the last 5 years. Although there has been a significant increase, the majority of centers (78.6%) have a minimal robotic activity. Future directions are going to be the presence of robotic platforms in every pediatric centers; in this way, the robots can be adopted routinely in the pediatric surgical practice as laparoscopy. For pediatric surgery, we also need smaller instruments because 8 mm cannot be adopted in neonates and smaller infants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251398694
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Status of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Surgery in Italy Part 2: National Survey on a 5-Year Period 2020–2025

Marco Castagnetti, Glória Pelizzo, Girolamo Mattioli, Giovanni Cobellis et al.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

Current Status of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Surgery in Italy Part 2: National Survey on a 5-Year Period 2020–2025

Marco Castagnetti, Glória Pelizzo, Girolamo Mattioli, Giovanni Cobellis, Francesco Molinaro, Daniele Alberti, Gabriele Lisi, Umberto Ferrentino, Simona Gerocarni Nappo, Francesco Fascetti Leon, Vincenzo Di Benedetto, F. Camoglio, Carmelo Romeo, Roberta Guglielmini
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Following a previous study focused on the status of robotic surgery in Italy in 2020, we aimed to present the updated study reflecting data up to 2025. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> An online questionnaire has been sent to robotic pediatric centers in Italy. The duration of robotic activity, the number of surgeons performing robot-assisted surgery (RAS), the modality of training, volume, type, and outcome of RAS in each participating center have been collected and analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The number of centers practicing robotic surgery in Italy increased by 55.5% rate. All 14 centers adopted the Da Vinci Intuitive console. Three out of 14 centers have a dedicated console, while 11 out of 14 centers share the robotic platform with adult surgeons. Nine out of 14 centers routinely adopted a fourth 5-mm laparoscopic trocar for the bedside surgeon. About 1105 robotic procedures have been performed, the majority were still urological (46.7%). The others were gastrointestinal 18%, oncological 17.1%, gynecological 10.9%, and thoracic 3.6%. The rest (3.7%) were considered varia. All centers prefer to operate patients weighing more than 10-15 kg. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Robotic pediatric activity in Italy has had an important development in the last 5 years. Although there has been a significant increase, the majority of centers (78.6%) have a minimal robotic activity. Future directions are going to be the presence of robotic platforms in every pediatric centers; in this way, the robots can be adopted routinely in the pediatric surgical practice as laparoscopy. For pediatric surgery, we also need smaller instruments because 8 mm cannot be adopted in neonates and smaller infants.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(12)
University of Siena (IT), University of Messina (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Sassari (IT), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), University of Catania (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (IT), Fondazione Ospedale Salesi (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Policlinico Universitario di Catania (IT), Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona (IT), Ospedale Regina Margherita (IT), Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.