Comparative Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisor Width, Length, and Proportions between Genders

Objective: To compare the width, length, and width-to-length ratio of the right and left maxillary central incisors between males and females. Study Design: A cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Prosthodontics, Saidu College of Dentistry, Saidu Sharif, Swat, Pakistan; from January 2023 to December 2023. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty participants (75 males; 75 females) were included. Mesiodistal width and gingivo-incisal length of right and left MCI were measured on casts using a digital Vernier caliper (0.01 mm). Group means were compared with independent-samples t-tests (two-sided α = 0.05); Cohen’s d and 95% CIs were reported. Results: Males showed larger MCI dimensions than females. For the right MCI, width was 8.6 ± 0.4 mm in males vs 8.2 ± 0.3 mm in females (p < 0.001; d = 0.89), and length was 11.2 ± 0.5 mm vs 10.8 ± 0.4 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.82). For the left MCI, width was 8.5 ± 0.4 mm vs 8.1 ± 0.3 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.87), and length was 11.1 ± 0.5 mm vs 10.7 ± 0.4 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.80). Differences in the W/L ratio were small (right: p = 0.051; d = 0.32; left: p = 0.034; d = 0.35). Conclusion: Maxillary central incisors exhibit clear sexual dimorphism in size—males have broader and longer crowns—while the W/L ratio remains relatively stable between sexes, indicating maintained proportionality. These findings inform esthetic tooth selection and forensic identification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bacha Khan College of Dentistry
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65293/jbkcd.v2i02.22
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisor Width, Length, and Proportions between Genders

Samia Rahman, Abdullah Abdullah
Journal of Bacha Khan College of Dentistry
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparative Analysis of Maxillary Central Incisor Width, Length, and Proportions between Genders

Samia Rahman, Abdullah Abdullah
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the width, length, and width-to-length ratio of the right and left maxillary central incisors between males and females. Study Design: A cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Prosthodontics, Saidu College of Dentistry, Saidu Sharif, Swat, Pakistan; from January 2023 to December 2023. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty participants (75 males; 75 females) were included. Mesiodistal width and gingivo-incisal length of right and left MCI were measured on casts using a digital Vernier caliper (0.01 mm). Group means were compared with independent-samples t-tests (two-sided α = 0.05); Cohen’s d and 95% CIs were reported. Results: Males showed larger MCI dimensions than females. For the right MCI, width was 8.6 ± 0.4 mm in males vs 8.2 ± 0.3 mm in females (p < 0.001; d = 0.89), and length was 11.2 ± 0.5 mm vs 10.8 ± 0.4 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.82). For the left MCI, width was 8.5 ± 0.4 mm vs 8.1 ± 0.3 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.87), and length was 11.1 ± 0.5 mm vs 10.7 ± 0.4 mm (p < 0.001; d = 0.80). Differences in the W/L ratio were small (right: p = 0.051; d = 0.32; left: p = 0.034; d = 0.35). Conclusion: Maxillary central incisors exhibit clear sexual dimorphism in size—males have broader and longer crowns—while the W/L ratio remains relatively stable between sexes, indicating maintained proportionality. These findings inform esthetic tooth selection and forensic identification.

Journal of Bacha Khan College of DentistryVol. 2(2)
Saidu Teaching Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.