Finite‐Discrete Element Methods‐Based Analysis of Layer Thickness Effects on Mechanical Behaviour and Fracture Mechanisms in Anisotropic Shale

ABSTRACT Layer thickness in shale arises from sedimentary variability and governs the density of weak bedding planes that act as primary pathways for fracture development. Although many studies address bedding orientation, the influence of layer thickness on mechanical behaviour and fracture mechanisms of shale remains under‐examined. This paper employs a finite‐discrete element method (FDEM) anisotropic shale model to systematically investigate how layer thickness influences shale's anisotropic mechanical and fracturing behaviours from a micro‐crack viewpoint. The results show that the sensitivity of layer thickness shows great anisotropy. The mechanical behaviours, fracture mechanism and brittleness of shale inclined at 45° and 90° are significantly affected by layer thickness, while shale with 0° inclination remains unaffected. The crack initiation stress ( CI ) threshold is independent of both layer thickness and bedding inclination, offering a robust input for future anisotropic constitutive models of layered rocks. By contrast, the crack damage stress ( CD ) threshold of shale at 45° and 90° rises with increasing thickness, indicating an earlier onset of unstable fracture growth under higher bedding densities. Furthermore, a novel brittleness index, BI C , has been proposed. It relates brittleness to the CI / CD ratio. Validation using both laboratory and numerical simulation data shows that BI C reliably evaluates shale brittleness. As BI C is derived from uniaxial compressive strength tests alone, it is more practical than conventional indices for future assessments of rock brittleness. In addition, compared with conventional brittleness indices, BI C captures the effects of shale anisotropy more effectively, showing larger and clearer differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70163
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite‐Discrete Element Methods‐Based Analysis of Layer Thickness Effects on Mechanical Behaviour and Fracture Mechanisms in Anisotropic Shale

Jimeng Feng, Xiangsheng Chen, Hongtao Li, Dong Su et al.
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Finite‐Discrete Element Methods‐Based Analysis of Layer Thickness Effects on Mechanical Behaviour and Fracture Mechanisms in Anisotropic Shale

Jimeng Feng, Xiangsheng Chen, Hongtao Li, Dong Su, Lu Hai, Junru Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Layer thickness in shale arises from sedimentary variability and governs the density of weak bedding planes that act as primary pathways for fracture development. Although many studies address bedding orientation, the influence of layer thickness on mechanical behaviour and fracture mechanisms of shale remains under‐examined. This paper employs a finite‐discrete element method (FDEM) anisotropic shale model to systematically investigate how layer thickness influences shale's anisotropic mechanical and fracturing behaviours from a micro‐crack viewpoint. The results show that the sensitivity of layer thickness shows great anisotropy. The mechanical behaviours, fracture mechanism and brittleness of shale inclined at 45° and 90° are significantly affected by layer thickness, while shale with 0° inclination remains unaffected. The crack initiation stress ( CI ) threshold is independent of both layer thickness and bedding inclination, offering a robust input for future anisotropic constitutive models of layered rocks. By contrast, the crack damage stress ( CD ) threshold of shale at 45° and 90° rises with increasing thickness, indicating an earlier onset of unstable fracture growth under higher bedding densities. Furthermore, a novel brittleness index, BI C , has been proposed. It relates brittleness to the CI / CD ratio. Validation using both laboratory and numerical simulation data shows that BI C reliably evaluates shale brittleness. As BI C is derived from uniaxial compressive strength tests alone, it is more practical than conventional indices for future assessments of rock brittleness. In addition, compared with conventional brittleness indices, BI C captures the effects of shale anisotropy more effectively, showing larger and clearer differences.

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsVol. 50(2)
Shenzhen University (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.