The Vibrancy of Ruins in Ancient Mesoamerica

Abstract This article considers people’s relations with ruins in the Mesoamerican past from the perspective of two approaches within the ontological turn. The first examines ruins drawing on Indigenous ontologies, while the second involves the application of a new materialist perspective that incorporates Peircean semiotics. Both approaches view matter as animate and share a relational, nonbinary, and nonessentializing position. Research drawing on ethnographic and ethnohistoric accounts of Native American perspectives considers ruins as living entities often inhabited by divinities, ancestors, or pre-Sunrise beings, which could require propitiation and reverence or provoke denigration and erasure. A new materialist perspective allows archaeologists to better recognize what ruins did beyond holding meanings imposed on them by people. Ruins in ancient Mesoamerica had the vibrancy and power to gather people, offerings, shrines, and the dead in ways that constituted community and temporality, contested or legitimated authority, and invoked the cosmic creation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Latin American Antiquity
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2025.10117
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Vibrancy of Ruins in Ancient Mesoamerica

Arthur A. Joyce, Roberto Rosado-Ramirez
3 citations
Latin American Antiquity
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
12.99
article

The Vibrancy of Ruins in Ancient Mesoamerica

Arthur A. Joyce, Roberto Rosado-Ramirez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article considers people’s relations with ruins in the Mesoamerican past from the perspective of two approaches within the ontological turn. The first examines ruins drawing on Indigenous ontologies, while the second involves the application of a new materialist perspective that incorporates Peircean semiotics. Both approaches view matter as animate and share a relational, nonbinary, and nonessentializing position. Research drawing on ethnographic and ethnohistoric accounts of Native American perspectives considers ruins as living entities often inhabited by divinities, ancestors, or pre-Sunrise beings, which could require propitiation and reverence or provoke denigration and erasure. A new materialist perspective allows archaeologists to better recognize what ruins did beyond holding meanings imposed on them by people. Ruins in ancient Mesoamerica had the vibrancy and power to gather people, offerings, shrines, and the dead in ways that constituted community and temporality, contested or legitimated authority, and invoked the cosmic creation.

Latin American Antiquity
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
12.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Vibrancy of Ruins in Ancient Mesoamerica — Arthur A. Joyce, Roberto Rosado-Ramirez · Latin American Antiquity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS