Enhancing Legal Gender Recognition Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis Between Ireland and Thailand

ABSTRACT This comparative study examines the legal gender recognition frameworks of Thailand and Ireland to propose enhancements for Thailand's “Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and Sex Characteristics Recognition Bill, B.E. ….” Using content analysis, the research explores differences in legislative structures, procedural inclusivity, and implementation. Ireland's streamlined process emphasizes accessibility and equality, contrasting with Thailand's court‐centered approach. Key recommendations for Thailand include simplifying application procedures, broadening definitions to encompass non‐binary identities, and strengthening anti‐discrimination measures. These adjustments aim to align Thailand's framework with international standards, fostering inclusivity and protection for transgender individuals. The findings contribute to the global discourse on advancing legal gender recognition and promoting human rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.70032
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Legal Gender Recognition Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis Between Ireland and Thailand

Phuwadate Wongkiam, Thannapat Jarernpanit, Phimol Kasemsaowaphak
Sexuality Gender & Policy
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Enhancing Legal Gender Recognition Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis Between Ireland and Thailand

Phuwadate Wongkiam, Thannapat Jarernpanit, Phimol Kasemsaowaphak
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This comparative study examines the legal gender recognition frameworks of Thailand and Ireland to propose enhancements for Thailand's “Gender Identity, Gender Expression, and Sex Characteristics Recognition Bill, B.E. ….” Using content analysis, the research explores differences in legislative structures, procedural inclusivity, and implementation. Ireland's streamlined process emphasizes accessibility and equality, contrasting with Thailand's court‐centered approach. Key recommendations for Thailand include simplifying application procedures, broadening definitions to encompass non‐binary identities, and strengthening anti‐discrimination measures. These adjustments aim to align Thailand's framework with international standards, fostering inclusivity and protection for transgender individuals. The findings contribute to the global discourse on advancing legal gender recognition and promoting human rights.

Sexuality Gender & PolicyVol. 8(4)
Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University (TH), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.