From intuition to action: Exploring teachers’ ethical awareness in the use of AI tools in education

This study investigates how teachers perceive and understand ethical issues arising from the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, and identifies the factors influencing their ethical awareness. Grounded in the Social Intuitionist Model (SIM), which emphasizes intuitive and emotionally driven moral judgments, the research explores teachers’ ethical perceptions as shaped by classroom experiences (micro/meso contexts) and broader social, cultural, and institutional influences (macro contexts) surrounding AI integration. Using a case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 26 teachers from primary and secondary schools, selected for their experience with AI integration. Thematic analysis revealed a four-pathway intuitive process: Functional-First, Triggered Ethical Awakening, Ethical Reflection and Reevaluation, and Ethical Adjustment. Teachers initially adopted AI for efficiency, but ethical awareness emerged through discomfort with issues such as student overreliance, biased content, and privacy breaches. Factors influencing awareness were categorized into individual (e.g., reflective disposition, technical understanding), interpersonal (e.g., peer dialogue), and school elements (e.g., workload, institutional support). The findings revealed that ethical awareness is dynamic and socially embedded, often initiated by emotional responses and reinforced through professional interactions. The study contributes original insights into the intuitive mechanisms of ethical recognition for teachers in the Chinese context. It underscores the need for structured ethical training, supportive school environments, and policy alignment to foster responsible AI use in education. • Teachers' AI ethics awareness unfolds through four interconnected pathways of intuitive process. • Ethical concerns often triggered by discomfort, not formal reasoning. • Social context shapes teachers’ ethical recognition of AI issues. • Peer dialogue boosts ethical sensitivity. • Study uses SIM to explain moral intuition in AI-supported classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100502
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From intuition to action: Exploring teachers’ ethical awareness in the use of AI tools in education

John Chi‐Kin Lee, Chun Sing Maxwell Ho
2 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

From intuition to action: Exploring teachers’ ethical awareness in the use of AI tools in education

John Chi‐Kin Lee, Chun Sing Maxwell Ho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how teachers perceive and understand ethical issues arising from the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, and identifies the factors influencing their ethical awareness. Grounded in the Social Intuitionist Model (SIM), which emphasizes intuitive and emotionally driven moral judgments, the research explores teachers’ ethical perceptions as shaped by classroom experiences (micro/meso contexts) and broader social, cultural, and institutional influences (macro contexts) surrounding AI integration. Using a case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 26 teachers from primary and secondary schools, selected for their experience with AI integration. Thematic analysis revealed a four-pathway intuitive process: Functional-First, Triggered Ethical Awakening, Ethical Reflection and Reevaluation, and Ethical Adjustment. Teachers initially adopted AI for efficiency, but ethical awareness emerged through discomfort with issues such as student overreliance, biased content, and privacy breaches. Factors influencing awareness were categorized into individual (e.g., reflective disposition, technical understanding), interpersonal (e.g., peer dialogue), and school elements (e.g., workload, institutional support). The findings revealed that ethical awareness is dynamic and socially embedded, often initiated by emotional responses and reinforced through professional interactions. The study contributes original insights into the intuitive mechanisms of ethical recognition for teachers in the Chinese context. It underscores the need for structured ethical training, supportive school environments, and policy alignment to foster responsible AI use in education. • Teachers' AI ethics awareness unfolds through four interconnected pathways of intuitive process. • Ethical concerns often triggered by discomfort, not formal reasoning. • Social context shapes teachers’ ethical recognition of AI issues. • Peer dialogue boosts ethical sensitivity. • Study uses SIM to explain moral intuition in AI-supported classrooms.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.