A supply-demand evaluation framework for uncovering age and gender inequities in urban green space cooling- A case study of Fuzhou

Rapid urbanization and intensified urban heat island effects have increased the need for effective, equitable cooling strategies. Urban green spaces (UGS), as nature-based solutions, provide critical cooling benefits that support thermal comfort and enhance urban resilience. However, disparities in cooling needs and access persist across gender and age, with vulnerable populations often facing unequal access to UGS resources. Despite growing attention to UGS equity, methods for quantifying demographic-specific mismatches between cooling supply and population demand remain underdeveloped. To address this gap, we developed a supply–demand evaluation framework to examine spatial equity and age- and gender-related environmental injustices in UGS cooling benefits in Fuzhou, China. The results show: 1) UGS cooling benefits supply and demand exhibit broadly similar spatial patterns across demographic groups but divergent patterns between the urban center and periphery. 2) Fuzhou’s main urban area faces pronounced supply–demand mismatches, with elderly and female populations more affected by uneven resource distribution. 3) Significant disparities (p < 0.001) exist across age and gender groups, with children and middle-aged adults experiencing greater mismatches, while men face more severe supply deficits. Although UGS spatially favors vulnerable groups, substantial inequities in cooling access remain. Notably, targeted planning and management strategies were proposed for urban and green space systems, tailored to different population groups and types of supply–demand mismatch. This study highlights the urgent need for age- and gender-responsive UGS planning and offers a transferable approach to reduce cooling inequalities, supporting more equitable and climate-resilient urban environments. • A supply-demand evaluation framework for UGS cooling equity. • Age- and gender-based disparities in access to UGS cooling benefits were identified. • Children, middle-aged adults, and men experience major supply-demand mismatches. • UGS resources in Fuzhou’s main urban area tend to favor vulnerable groups. • Transferable strategies are proposed to support equitable planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129172
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A supply-demand evaluation framework for uncovering age and gender inequities in urban green space cooling- A case study of Fuzhou

Meizi You, Huili Xie, Zhikang Bao, Yi Xiao et al.
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
article

A supply-demand evaluation framework for uncovering age and gender inequities in urban green space cooling- A case study of Fuzhou

Meizi You, Huili Xie, Zhikang Bao, Yi Xiao, Xingzhao Liu, ChengHe Guan, Shengping Li, Xiaofeng Gao, Jing Liu
article en

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and intensified urban heat island effects have increased the need for effective, equitable cooling strategies. Urban green spaces (UGS), as nature-based solutions, provide critical cooling benefits that support thermal comfort and enhance urban resilience. However, disparities in cooling needs and access persist across gender and age, with vulnerable populations often facing unequal access to UGS resources. Despite growing attention to UGS equity, methods for quantifying demographic-specific mismatches between cooling supply and population demand remain underdeveloped. To address this gap, we developed a supply–demand evaluation framework to examine spatial equity and age- and gender-related environmental injustices in UGS cooling benefits in Fuzhou, China. The results show: 1) UGS cooling benefits supply and demand exhibit broadly similar spatial patterns across demographic groups but divergent patterns between the urban center and periphery. 2) Fuzhou’s main urban area faces pronounced supply–demand mismatches, with elderly and female populations more affected by uneven resource distribution. 3) Significant disparities (p < 0.001) exist across age and gender groups, with children and middle-aged adults experiencing greater mismatches, while men face more severe supply deficits. Although UGS spatially favors vulnerable groups, substantial inequities in cooling access remain. Notably, targeted planning and management strategies were proposed for urban and green space systems, tailored to different population groups and types of supply–demand mismatch. This study highlights the urgent need for age- and gender-responsive UGS planning and offers a transferable approach to reduce cooling inequalities, supporting more equitable and climate-resilient urban environments. • A supply-demand evaluation framework for UGS cooling equity. • Age- and gender-based disparities in access to UGS cooling benefits were identified. • Children, middle-aged adults, and men experience major supply-demand mismatches. • UGS resources in Fuzhou’s main urban area tend to favor vulnerable groups. • Transferable strategies are proposed to support equitable planning.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 116
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Curtin University (AU), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Shanghai Urban Construction Design and Research Institute (Group) (CN), Wagner College (US), Monash University (AU), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.