Strategies of asymmetric diplomacy of small states in a multipolar world

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to understand the role of small states in the transformation of the international system in the context of the transition to multipolarity. The aim of the study was to analyse the theoretical foundations and practical mechanisms of asymmetric diplomacy of small states in the context of the transformation of the global order, to identify the key factors of its effectiveness and to justify the optimal approaches to its implementation. Methodologically, the work was based on institutional analysis with elements of comparative and conceptual modelling. The study identified four types of asymmetric diplomacy: humanitarian, expert, subversive and neutral, each of which is based on the resources and strategic positioning of small states. The empirical material covered cases from Qatar, Norway, Switzerland, Singapore, Iceland, Estonia, Ireland, Costa Rica, and Finland. The study analysed examples of information influence, mediation, climate diplomacy, institutional participation and educational partnerships as foreign policy tools. Norway uses humanitarian diplomacy and mediation, relying on its reputation as a neutral peacemaker, and is actively involved in peace processes (Colombia, Sri Lanka), combining state initiatives with the work of non-governmental organisations. Qatar implements a subversive strategy through media influence and economic diplomacy, mediating conflicts in the Middle East and using financial resources to build geopolitical authority. Singapore's main tool is expert diplomacy in the fields of technology, fintech and climate, creating international platforms (Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore FinTech Festival) and positioning itself as a neutral technocratic mediator between the West and Asia. The conclusion found that small states are capable of implementing influential foreign policy through niche expertise and institutional positioning. The practical significance of the work lies in the development of a conceptual framework for the formation of foreign policy strategies of small states in a complex global environment