The role of digital platforms in the transformation of political parties

The aim of the study was to identify the role of digital platforms in the transformation of political parties, particularly the structure, communication, and participation. The methodology was based on an interdisciplinary approach that combined case analysis, conceptual models from political science, digital sociology and organisation theory. As a result of the study, it was revealed that digital platforms radically changed the mechanisms of political communication, transforming these mechanisms into interactive forms of interaction. The introduction of digital participation caused the emergence of new formats of intra-party democracy, particularly through crowdsourcing and direct online voting. Structural changes in parties demonstrated the weakening of the traditional hierarchy and the growth of network forms of coordination. Case studies showed that digitalisation caused both democratic innovations and centralisation of control over platforms, i.e. digital platforms contributed to the hybridisation of party structures, combining hierarchical and network models, as in the cases of Rousseau (Italy) and LiquidFeedback (Germany); digital platforms expanded citizens’ participation through e-voting and crowdsourcing (Podemos, Decidim), but also led to centralisation of data control and manipulation of algorithms (Trump’s campaigns, criticism of Movimento 5 Stelle). The formation of hybrid party models was defined, which adapted digital tools within classical institutional structures. New practices such as microtargeting and personalisation changed the nature of leadership and legitimacy. It was established that the effectiveness of digital transformation depended on the national institutional context. In conclusion, digital platforms created both new opportunities and risks for party functioning, and the impact was ambiguous and contextually dependent. The most effective appeared to be hybrid organisational models, which combined the traditional with the innovative. The practical significance of the study lay in the formation of tools for the optimisation of party structures, the improvement of electoral technologies and the development of regulatory frameworks on digital democracy, which could be used by political parties, government bodies and civil society to increase the effectiveness of political governance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59214/ua.fa/5.2025.39
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of digital platforms in the transformation of political parties

Dario Sipos
1 citations
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

The role of digital platforms in the transformation of political parties

Dario Sipos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the role of digital platforms in the transformation of political parties, particularly the structure, communication, and participation. The methodology was based on an interdisciplinary approach that combined case analysis, conceptual models from political science, digital sociology and organisation theory. As a result of the study, it was revealed that digital platforms radically changed the mechanisms of political communication, transforming these mechanisms into interactive forms of interaction. The introduction of digital participation caused the emergence of new formats of intra-party democracy, particularly through crowdsourcing and direct online voting. Structural changes in parties demonstrated the weakening of the traditional hierarchy and the growth of network forms of coordination. Case studies showed that digitalisation caused both democratic innovations and centralisation of control over platforms, i.e. digital platforms contributed to the hybridisation of party structures, combining hierarchical and network models, as in the cases of Rousseau (Italy) and LiquidFeedback (Germany); digital platforms expanded citizens’ participation through e-voting and crowdsourcing (Podemos, Decidim), but also led to centralisation of data control and manipulation of algorithms (Trump’s campaigns, criticism of Movimento 5 Stelle). The formation of hybrid party models was defined, which adapted digital tools within classical institutional structures. New practices such as microtargeting and personalisation changed the nature of leadership and legitimacy. It was established that the effectiveness of digital transformation depended on the national institutional context. In conclusion, digital platforms created both new opportunities and risks for party functioning, and the impact was ambiguous and contextually dependent. The most effective appeared to be hybrid organisational models, which combined the traditional with the innovative. The practical significance of the study lay in the formation of tools for the optimisation of party structures, the improvement of electoral technologies and the development of regulatory frameworks on digital democracy, which could be used by political parties, government bodies and civil society to increase the effectiveness of political governance

FOREIGN AFFAIRSVol. 35(5)
Croatian Science Foundation (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.