Changes in Maxillary Incisor Inclination Before and After Orthodontic Treatment Across Vertical Skeletal Patterns

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate changes in maxillary incisor inclination before and after orthodontic treatment in adults with different vertical facial patterns (normodivergent, hypodivergent, hyperdivergent) and to assess the relationship of incisor inclination to facial and growth axes using cephalometric and photographic records. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 144 non-growing patients (96 females, 48 males) with available pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms and smiling profile photographs. Patients were classified into three groups based on mandibular plane angle (MP/SN): normodivergent (<i>n</i> = 66), hypodivergent (<i>n</i> = 35), and hyperdivergent (<i>n</i> = 43). Angular measurements assessed maxillary incisor inclination and growth/facial axes. Clinical crown angulation (CCA) was evaluated from profile photographs. Statistical analyses included paired <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, and Pearson correlation. <b>Results</b>: No significant changes in maxillary incisor inclination were observed post-treatment in any of the groups. Significant skeletal changes were noted in the hypodivergent group, including increases in MP/SN (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and IMPA (<i>p</i> = 0.014). Intergroup comparison revealed significant differences in changes in Facial Axis/H (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and MP/SN (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Correlations between CCA and skeletal axes were more pronounced in normo- and hypodivergent groups, while hyperdivergent patients showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that the stability of maxillary incisor inclination reflects controlled torque mechanics during treatment. In normo- and hypodivergent patients, skeletal axes may help guide esthetic incisor positioning; however, in hyperdivergent patients, soft tissue and smile evaluation should play a greater role when determining final incisor inclination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222933
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Maxillary Incisor Inclination Before and After Orthodontic Treatment Across Vertical Skeletal Patterns

Anthony T. Macari, Samar Bou Assi, Antoine Hanna, Rita Khoury
Diagnostics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Changes in Maxillary Incisor Inclination Before and After Orthodontic Treatment Across Vertical Skeletal Patterns

Anthony T. Macari, Samar Bou Assi, Antoine Hanna, Rita Khoury
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate changes in maxillary incisor inclination before and after orthodontic treatment in adults with different vertical facial patterns (normodivergent, hypodivergent, hyperdivergent) and to assess the relationship of incisor inclination to facial and growth axes using cephalometric and photographic records. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 144 non-growing patients (96 females, 48 males) with available pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms and smiling profile photographs. Patients were classified into three groups based on mandibular plane angle (MP/SN): normodivergent (<i>n</i> = 66), hypodivergent (<i>n</i> = 35), and hyperdivergent (<i>n</i> = 43). Angular measurements assessed maxillary incisor inclination and growth/facial axes. Clinical crown angulation (CCA) was evaluated from profile photographs. Statistical analyses included paired <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, and Pearson correlation. <b>Results</b>: No significant changes in maxillary incisor inclination were observed post-treatment in any of the groups. Significant skeletal changes were noted in the hypodivergent group, including increases in MP/SN (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and IMPA (<i>p</i> = 0.014). Intergroup comparison revealed significant differences in changes in Facial Axis/H (<i>p</i> = 0.020) and MP/SN (<i>p</i> = 0.025). Correlations between CCA and skeletal axes were more pronounced in normo- and hypodivergent groups, while hyperdivergent patients showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that the stability of maxillary incisor inclination reflects controlled torque mechanics during treatment. In normo- and hypodivergent patients, skeletal axes may help guide esthetic incisor positioning; however, in hyperdivergent patients, soft tissue and smile evaluation should play a greater role when determining final incisor inclination.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(22)
Lebanese University (LB), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.