Energy market deregulation: A new perspective on dividend smoothing

• We study how US utility firms adopted their dividend policies after deregulations. • We show that deregulation significantly reduced dividend smoothing among utility firms. • We show that deregulation made it harder for firms to maintaining dividend smoothing. This paper investigates how U.S. electricity and gas utility firms adapted their dividend policies in response to deregulation of the energy sector, with a focus on understanding the internal financial mechanisms that support or constrain dividend smoothing. Using Lintner’s (1956) speed of adjustment model and a variance decomposition framework, we provide new evidence that deregulation significantly reduced dividend smoothing among utility firms, unlike their counterparts in the broader energy sector or non-energy industries. Specifically, we find that after deregulation, utility firms relied more heavily on debt financing and curtailed investment when faced with an income shock but also reflected that shock in the dividends more than before deregulation. Our empirical analysis draws on firm-level data from 1969 to 2021 and compares behaviour before and after deregulation across multiple firm categories, including a matched sample of non-utility firms. We show that deregulation made it harder for firms to maintaining the same level of dividend smoothing. These findings give insights on the importance of regulatory context in corporate finance research, and how market liberalization can impact not only competition and pricing for the affected sectors, but also the strategies firms use to balance investor expectations and operational needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102260
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy market deregulation: A new perspective on dividend smoothing

Indrit Hoxha, Hatice Ozer Balli, Tam Hoang Nhat Dang, Thi Thu Ha Nguyen et al.
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Energy market deregulation: A new perspective on dividend smoothing

Indrit Hoxha, Hatice Ozer Balli, Tam Hoang Nhat Dang, Thi Thu Ha Nguyen, Faruk Balli
article en

Abstract

• We study how US utility firms adopted their dividend policies after deregulations. • We show that deregulation significantly reduced dividend smoothing among utility firms. • We show that deregulation made it harder for firms to maintaining dividend smoothing. This paper investigates how U.S. electricity and gas utility firms adapted their dividend policies in response to deregulation of the energy sector, with a focus on understanding the internal financial mechanisms that support or constrain dividend smoothing. Using Lintner’s (1956) speed of adjustment model and a variance decomposition framework, we provide new evidence that deregulation significantly reduced dividend smoothing among utility firms, unlike their counterparts in the broader energy sector or non-energy industries. Specifically, we find that after deregulation, utility firms relied more heavily on debt financing and curtailed investment when faced with an income shock but also reflected that shock in the dividends more than before deregulation. Our empirical analysis draws on firm-level data from 1969 to 2021 and compares behaviour before and after deregulation across multiple firm categories, including a matched sample of non-utility firms. We show that deregulation made it harder for firms to maintaining the same level of dividend smoothing. These findings give insights on the importance of regulatory context in corporate finance research, and how market liberalization can impact not only competition and pricing for the affected sectors, but also the strategies firms use to balance investor expectations and operational needs.

Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and MoneyVol. 106
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Pennsylvania State University (US), Lincoln University (NZ), Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Massey University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.