Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World

ABSTRACT This article is the first to take a global perspective on parliamentary administrations, which are vital for democratic governance. Basic facts like what drives the number of parliamentary staffers are unknown to political science. Drawing from a functionalist framework, we propose that staff plays different roles which lead to different possible drivers: if staff primarily serves to relay information from and to the population, population size is likely a major driver. If staff primarily serves to advise MPs in their oversight work, stronger parliaments will have more staff. If staff primarily serves to assist MPs in their day‐to‐day work, assembly size drives staff size. As an alternative, we apply the notion of institutional isomorphism. Parliaments in shared networks will likely emulate each other. We analyze data from 144 countries. We find that staff size reflects assembly size, population size and parliamentary power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World

Simon Otjes, Daan Hofland
1 citations
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World

Simon Otjes, Daan Hofland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is the first to take a global perspective on parliamentary administrations, which are vital for democratic governance. Basic facts like what drives the number of parliamentary staffers are unknown to political science. Drawing from a functionalist framework, we propose that staff plays different roles which lead to different possible drivers: if staff primarily serves to relay information from and to the population, population size is likely a major driver. If staff primarily serves to advise MPs in their oversight work, stronger parliaments will have more staff. If staff primarily serves to assist MPs in their day‐to‐day work, assembly size drives staff size. As an alternative, we apply the notion of institutional isomorphism. Parliaments in shared networks will likely emulate each other. We analyze data from 144 countries. We find that staff size reflects assembly size, population size and parliamentary power.

Legislative Studies QuarterlyVol. 50(4)
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World — Simon Otjes, Daan Hofland · Legislative Studies Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS