Construction and validation of a multi-dimensional lifecycle evaluation (MD-LEA) system for ecological restoration technologies: Case studies from heavy metal contaminated sites in Nanyang, Hunan, and Xinxiang, China

• A multi-dimensional system (MD-LEA) assesses restoration technology lifecycle. • Adaptive weighting combines Case-Based Reasoning with LSTM-NSGA-II optimization. • System dynamically adjusts decision priorities based on environmental triggers. • Identifies holistically resilient technologies over single-criterion optima. • Validated at three contaminated sites with a two-year field assessment. Selecting optimal ecological restoration technologies requires a comprehensive, long-term, and adaptive assessment, which current methods often lack. To address this gap, we developed and validated a Multi-dimensional Lifecycle Evaluation (MD-LEA) system. This system integrates four key dimensions: restoration efficiency ( η ), lifecycle cost ( C ), ecosystem service value (ESV), and integrated risk ( R ). Its core innovation is a hybrid adaptive weighting mechanism that uses Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) for initial weight setting, combined with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) for dynamic optimization when environmental triggers are activated. The MD-LEA system was applied to three distinct heavy metal-contaminated sites in China, successfully identifying the most suitable technology for each site by balancing competing objectives, yielding comprehensive benefit scores (F-values) ranging from 0.713 to 0.782. Crucially, the system’s adaptive weighting mechanism dynamically adjusted priorities in response to environmental triggers, which in one case led to the selection of a more holistically resilient solution over a technology that was superior in efficiency alone. A two-year field validation confirmed the system’s strong short-term predictive accuracy (e.g., Pb removal showed only a −4.6% deviation from prediction), while larger deviations in long-term indicators such as Ecosystem Service Value (−31.3%) successfully triggered the system’s designed recalibration protocols, underscoring the necessity of its adaptive feedback loop for managing long-term uncertainties. The MD-LEA system provides a scientific and dynamic decision-support tool that, with appropriate regional calibration, can be adapted for diverse ecological restoration challenges globally, promoting the selection of sustainable and resilient solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114449
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction and validation of a multi-dimensional lifecycle evaluation (MD-LEA) system for ecological restoration technologies: Case studies from heavy metal contaminated sites in Nanyang, Hunan, and Xinxiang, China

Yan Wu, Yongming Fan, Cai‐Feng Wang, Kai Wang
Ecological Indicators
Heavy metals in environment
article

Construction and validation of a multi-dimensional lifecycle evaluation (MD-LEA) system for ecological restoration technologies: Case studies from heavy metal contaminated sites in Nanyang, Hunan, and Xinxiang, China

Yan Wu, Yongming Fan, Cai‐Feng Wang, Kai Wang
article en

Abstract

• A multi-dimensional system (MD-LEA) assesses restoration technology lifecycle. • Adaptive weighting combines Case-Based Reasoning with LSTM-NSGA-II optimization. • System dynamically adjusts decision priorities based on environmental triggers. • Identifies holistically resilient technologies over single-criterion optima. • Validated at three contaminated sites with a two-year field assessment. Selecting optimal ecological restoration technologies requires a comprehensive, long-term, and adaptive assessment, which current methods often lack. To address this gap, we developed and validated a Multi-dimensional Lifecycle Evaluation (MD-LEA) system. This system integrates four key dimensions: restoration efficiency ( η ), lifecycle cost ( C ), ecosystem service value (ESV), and integrated risk ( R ). Its core innovation is a hybrid adaptive weighting mechanism that uses Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) for initial weight setting, combined with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) for dynamic optimization when environmental triggers are activated. The MD-LEA system was applied to three distinct heavy metal-contaminated sites in China, successfully identifying the most suitable technology for each site by balancing competing objectives, yielding comprehensive benefit scores (F-values) ranging from 0.713 to 0.782. Crucially, the system’s adaptive weighting mechanism dynamically adjusted priorities in response to environmental triggers, which in one case led to the selection of a more holistically resilient solution over a technology that was superior in efficiency alone. A two-year field validation confirmed the system’s strong short-term predictive accuracy (e.g., Pb removal showed only a −4.6% deviation from prediction), while larger deviations in long-term indicators such as Ecosystem Service Value (−31.3%) successfully triggered the system’s designed recalibration protocols, underscoring the necessity of its adaptive feedback loop for managing long-term uncertainties. The MD-LEA system provides a scientific and dynamic decision-support tool that, with appropriate regional calibration, can be adapted for diverse ecological restoration challenges globally, promoting the selection of sustainable and resilient solutions.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 181
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Heavy metals in environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.