Multidimensional energy poverty and food insecurity nexus in Gauteng and Western cape provinces of South Africa

Energy poverty and food insecurity are interconnected challenges that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations in low and middle-income countries. The paper utilised the Tobit regression model to examine the relationship between household food insecurity and various socioeconomic factors, and the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to examine the complex interactions between multidimensional energy poverty (MEP), (measured by the MEP fuzzy score) and food insecurity, measured by the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), mediated by various socioeconomic factors. A total of 6484 households were analysed, categorised by region and gender, in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of the Gauteng and Western Cape provinces of South Africa, using data from the 2021–2022 South African General Household Survey. The Tobit regression findings showed that higher household income consistently reduces food insecurity. A larger household size and increased MEP contribute to higher levels of food insecurity, with the effect of MEP being significant in the Western Cape. Social grant recipients remained more food insecure, suggesting persistent vulnerability. Spatial differences emerged, with higher food insecurity in metropolitan areas of the Western Cape but lower in Gauteng. The SEM analysis revealed that energy poverty has a direct and significant impact on food insecurity, with household income serving as the strongest mediating factor. Education, employment, and household size contributed modest indirect effects, while other socio-economic variables showed weak or inconsistent mediation. The paper highlights the importance of adopting integrated policy approaches that simultaneously address energy access and food security, with a focus on gender and spatial inequalities. • Energy poverty drives food insecurity, worst in non-metro, female-led households • Income strongly mediates the energy–food insecurity relationship. • Large households show complex roles in energy-food insecurity pathways. • Gender- and region-focused policies can reduce energy-food insecurity links.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104460
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional energy poverty and food insecurity nexus in Gauteng and Western cape provinces of South Africa

Adrino Mazenda
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Multidimensional energy poverty and food insecurity nexus in Gauteng and Western cape provinces of South Africa

Adrino Mazenda
article en

Abstract

Energy poverty and food insecurity are interconnected challenges that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations in low and middle-income countries. The paper utilised the Tobit regression model to examine the relationship between household food insecurity and various socioeconomic factors, and the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to examine the complex interactions between multidimensional energy poverty (MEP), (measured by the MEP fuzzy score) and food insecurity, measured by the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), mediated by various socioeconomic factors. A total of 6484 households were analysed, categorised by region and gender, in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of the Gauteng and Western Cape provinces of South Africa, using data from the 2021–2022 South African General Household Survey. The Tobit regression findings showed that higher household income consistently reduces food insecurity. A larger household size and increased MEP contribute to higher levels of food insecurity, with the effect of MEP being significant in the Western Cape. Social grant recipients remained more food insecure, suggesting persistent vulnerability. Spatial differences emerged, with higher food insecurity in metropolitan areas of the Western Cape but lower in Gauteng. The SEM analysis revealed that energy poverty has a direct and significant impact on food insecurity, with household income serving as the strongest mediating factor. Education, employment, and household size contributed modest indirect effects, while other socio-economic variables showed weak or inconsistent mediation. The paper highlights the importance of adopting integrated policy approaches that simultaneously address energy access and food security, with a focus on gender and spatial inequalities. • Energy poverty drives food insecurity, worst in non-metro, female-led households • Income strongly mediates the energy–food insecurity relationship. • Large households show complex roles in energy-food insecurity pathways. • Gender- and region-focused policies can reduce energy-food insecurity links.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 130
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.