The “Tower in the Park” in New York City (1930–1965): A Comparative Analysis between Cooperative and Public Housing

This paper analyses the success of “towers in the park” in New York City by comparing cooperative and public housing’s physical aspects over the middle decades of the twentieth century through the work of two architectural firms that spent their careers designing affordable housing complexes: Herman Jessor and Frederick G. Frost. To do so, four pairs of projects were explored in more depth, belonging to four stages in the history of this typology. The analysis concludes that systemic differences between these types of housing were determined by funding and policy while showing that these architects’ design approaches were quite similar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Planning History
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15385132251379786
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Tower in the Park” in New York City (1930–1965): A Comparative Analysis between Cooperative and Public Housing

Ana Torres Barchino, Jorge Llopis Verdú, Ana García Sánchez, Nicholas Bloom
1 citations
Journal of Planning History
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
6.18
article

The “Tower in the Park” in New York City (1930–1965): A Comparative Analysis between Cooperative and Public Housing

Ana Torres Barchino, Jorge Llopis Verdú, Ana García Sánchez, Nicholas Bloom
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses the success of “towers in the park” in New York City by comparing cooperative and public housing’s physical aspects over the middle decades of the twentieth century through the work of two architectural firms that spent their careers designing affordable housing complexes: Herman Jessor and Frederick G. Frost. To do so, four pairs of projects were explored in more depth, belonging to four stages in the history of this typology. The analysis concludes that systemic differences between these types of housing were determined by funding and policy while showing that these architects’ design approaches were quite similar.

Journal of Planning History
City University of New York (US), Hunter College (US), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.