The 2024 Presidential Election and the Enduring Power of the Racial Divide

Abstract The 2024 presidential contest was, for various reasons, simultaneously historic and unremarkable. The Republican nominee was a previously defeated president with a long list of scandals and seemingly insurmountable political baggage. The Democratic nominee was a Black and South Asian female vice president elevated in virtually the eleventh hour to replace an unpopular incumbent. For these reasons, and many others, the previously stable voter coalitions associated with each party might have differed sharply from past election cycles. But, in general, this did not happen. In this essay, I examine the demographic dynamics of the 2024 presidential election and highlight the relative stability of voting preferences based on gender, class, age, and religion. Most importantly, however, I underscore the enduring power of the most consequential demographic cleavage: the Black–White racial divide. Relying primarily, but not exclusively, on national exit poll data, I show that the Black American vote for the Democratic presidential nominee has remained reliably consistent since at least 1972. When adopting this longer time horizon, and contrary to some media accounts before and after the 2024 election, there is little support for the proposition that the Black vote is drifting away from the Democrats. Similarly, majority White support for the Republican presidential nominee has also remained steadfast, with, at most, only minor fluctuations during this period. I conclude by discussing the historical factors that gave rise to this enduring racial divide and why it is unlikely to dissipate any time soon.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Quarterly
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqaf092
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 2024 Presidential Election and the Enduring Power of the Racial Divide

Political Science Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The 2024 Presidential Election and the Enduring Power of the Racial Divide

article en

Abstract

Abstract The 2024 presidential contest was, for various reasons, simultaneously historic and unremarkable. The Republican nominee was a previously defeated president with a long list of scandals and seemingly insurmountable political baggage. The Democratic nominee was a Black and South Asian female vice president elevated in virtually the eleventh hour to replace an unpopular incumbent. For these reasons, and many others, the previously stable voter coalitions associated with each party might have differed sharply from past election cycles. But, in general, this did not happen. In this essay, I examine the demographic dynamics of the 2024 presidential election and highlight the relative stability of voting preferences based on gender, class, age, and religion. Most importantly, however, I underscore the enduring power of the most consequential demographic cleavage: the Black–White racial divide. Relying primarily, but not exclusively, on national exit poll data, I show that the Black American vote for the Democratic presidential nominee has remained reliably consistent since at least 1972. When adopting this longer time horizon, and contrary to some media accounts before and after the 2024 election, there is little support for the proposition that the Black vote is drifting away from the Democrats. Similarly, majority White support for the Republican presidential nominee has also remained steadfast, with, at most, only minor fluctuations during this period. I conclude by discussing the historical factors that gave rise to this enduring racial divide and why it is unlikely to dissipate any time soon.

Political Science QuarterlyVol. 141(1)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.