Vocal emotion recognition: A comparison of singers and instrumentalists, amateurs and professionals

Musicians outperform non-musicians in vocal emotion recognition (VER), presumably due to differences in auditory sensitivity. However, the current literature is inconclusive regarding differential effects of specific types of musical activity. Therefore, we compared emotion recognition performance of singers (<i>N</i> = 45) vs. instrumentalists (<i>N</i> = 43) and professional musicians (<i>N</i> = 40) vs. amateurs (<i>N</i> = 88) vs. non-musicians (<i>N</i> = 38), based on short vocal utterances expressing happiness, pleasure, fear, or sadness. Using both frequentist and Bayesian inference, we found the predicted null effects for singers vs. instrumentalists, and professionals vs. amateurs. Evidence for an advantage in amateurs vs. non-musicians was inconclusive. Across groups, we replicated the consistent link between VER and auditory sensitivity. Overall, the current work aligns with the perspective that musicians' advantage in recognizing vocal emotions is rooted in auditory sensitivity, rather than specific types of musical activities or formal training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vocal emotion recognition: A comparison of singers and instrumentalists, amateurs and professionals

Stefan R. Schweinberger, Annett Schirmer, Christine Nussbaum, Jessica Dethloff
1 citations
iScience
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
article

Vocal emotion recognition: A comparison of singers and instrumentalists, amateurs and professionals

Stefan R. Schweinberger, Annett Schirmer, Christine Nussbaum, Jessica Dethloff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Musicians outperform non-musicians in vocal emotion recognition (VER), presumably due to differences in auditory sensitivity. However, the current literature is inconclusive regarding differential effects of specific types of musical activity. Therefore, we compared emotion recognition performance of singers (<i>N</i> = 45) vs. instrumentalists (<i>N</i> = 43) and professional musicians (<i>N</i> = 40) vs. amateurs (<i>N</i> = 88) vs. non-musicians (<i>N</i> = 38), based on short vocal utterances expressing happiness, pleasure, fear, or sadness. Using both frequentist and Bayesian inference, we found the predicted null effects for singers vs. instrumentalists, and professionals vs. amateurs. Evidence for an advantage in amateurs vs. non-musicians was inconclusive. Across groups, we replicated the consistent link between VER and auditory sensitivity. Overall, the current work aligns with the perspective that musicians' advantage in recognizing vocal emotions is rooted in auditory sensitivity, rather than specific types of musical activities or formal training.

iScienceVol. 28(12)
University of Geneva (CH), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.