Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) coordinate complex oncology decisions across imaging, pathology, genomics, and patient factors. Here we synthesize how artificial intelligence (AI)-including machine learning, natural language processing, deep learning, and large language models-supports MDT preparation and deliberation. Across cancers, reported agreement between AI recommendations and MDT decisions commonly ranges from 70% to 90%, and task-focused tools achieve high diagnostic performance in screening and staging. Benefits include faster information synthesis, more consistent guideline alignment, and clearer documentation of options, while human review remains central. Key limitations-data bias, uneven generalizability, privacy and governance concerns, and limited prospective validation-temper adoption. We outline implementation priorities: prospective multicenter evaluation, integration with electronic records, clinician training, and transparent oversight. Overall, AI can augment MDT decision-making and help personalize care and workflow efficiency when deployed with rigorous evaluation and safeguards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114082
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology

Qianqian Wang, Yeqian Feng, Yuan Yan Tang, Junjie Wang et al.
2 citations
iScience
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology

Qianqian Wang, Yeqian Feng, Yuan Yan Tang, Junjie Wang, Gouping Ding, Xiaodong Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) coordinate complex oncology decisions across imaging, pathology, genomics, and patient factors. Here we synthesize how artificial intelligence (AI)-including machine learning, natural language processing, deep learning, and large language models-supports MDT preparation and deliberation. Across cancers, reported agreement between AI recommendations and MDT decisions commonly ranges from 70% to 90%, and task-focused tools achieve high diagnostic performance in screening and staging. Benefits include faster information synthesis, more consistent guideline alignment, and clearer documentation of options, while human review remains central. Key limitations-data bias, uneven generalizability, privacy and governance concerns, and limited prospective validation-temper adoption. We outline implementation priorities: prospective multicenter evaluation, integration with electronic records, clinician training, and transparent oversight. Overall, AI can augment MDT decision-making and help personalize care and workflow efficiency when deployed with rigorous evaluation and safeguards.

iScienceVol. 28(12)
Central South University (CN), Zhuzhou Central Hospital (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology — Qianqian Wang, Yeqian Feng, et al. · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS