Modeling and simulation of inertia and continuous drive friction welding of AISI 1215 steel

• Rotary friction welding and CFD simulation of AISI 1215. • Generation and validation of the material model. • Comparison of inertia and continuous drive friction welding. • Validation of methods for comparing weld result and simulation. • Close approximation of simulation and real welds. To accurately simulate rotary friction welding (RFW), calibration of the material model and friction conditions is essential. This study focuses on developing a material model and simulation for RFW of AISI 1215 free-machining steel in the environment “virtua RFW”. Inertia (IFW) and continuous drive friction welding (CDFW) were physically performed with comparable energy inputs to calibrate the simulation. The aim of this study is to examine the calibration procedure in detail and subsequently perform a simulation-based process comparison of IFW and CDFW. For calibration, four material and friction factors were varied in an L16 Taguchi array. Different methods for evaluating simulation quality were assessed. Upset deviation and flash angle α measurement via image processing were determined to be the most suitable methods for evaluating the alignment between simulation and real welds. Optimal simulation parameters were identified for IFW, closely matching experimental results. Due to the velocity and pressure dependence of the friction behavior, a direct transfer of parameters to CDFW was not possible, requiring adjustments and regression analysis for accurate prediction. Optimized simulations showed differences in the thermomechanical behavior: IFW exhibited a steeper temperature gradient with a minimum cooling time t8/5 of 2.5 s and a double-wedge shape in the affected zone, while CDFW showed a broader, more uniform zone with a minimum cooling time t8/5 of 3 s. These findings improve the understanding of IFW and CDFW and provide calibrated simulation models that could facilitate more efficient process development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Joining Processes
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajp.2025.100360
Primary Topic
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and simulation of inertia and continuous drive friction welding of AISI 1215 steel

Heinz Palkowski, Dirk Lindenau, Carina Vauderwange, Hadi Mozaffari Jovein
Journal of Advanced Joining Processes
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
article

Modeling and simulation of inertia and continuous drive friction welding of AISI 1215 steel

Heinz Palkowski, Dirk Lindenau, Carina Vauderwange, Hadi Mozaffari Jovein
article en

Abstract

• Rotary friction welding and CFD simulation of AISI 1215. • Generation and validation of the material model. • Comparison of inertia and continuous drive friction welding. • Validation of methods for comparing weld result and simulation. • Close approximation of simulation and real welds. To accurately simulate rotary friction welding (RFW), calibration of the material model and friction conditions is essential. This study focuses on developing a material model and simulation for RFW of AISI 1215 free-machining steel in the environment “virtua RFW”. Inertia (IFW) and continuous drive friction welding (CDFW) were physically performed with comparable energy inputs to calibrate the simulation. The aim of this study is to examine the calibration procedure in detail and subsequently perform a simulation-based process comparison of IFW and CDFW. For calibration, four material and friction factors were varied in an L16 Taguchi array. Different methods for evaluating simulation quality were assessed. Upset deviation and flash angle α measurement via image processing were determined to be the most suitable methods for evaluating the alignment between simulation and real welds. Optimal simulation parameters were identified for IFW, closely matching experimental results. Due to the velocity and pressure dependence of the friction behavior, a direct transfer of parameters to CDFW was not possible, requiring adjustments and regression analysis for accurate prediction. Optimized simulations showed differences in the thermomechanical behavior: IFW exhibited a steeper temperature gradient with a minimum cooling time t8/5 of 2.5 s and a double-wedge shape in the affected zone, while CDFW showed a broader, more uniform zone with a minimum cooling time t8/5 of 3 s. These findings improve the understanding of IFW and CDFW and provide calibrated simulation models that could facilitate more efficient process development.

Journal of Advanced Joining ProcessesVol. 12
Mercedes-Benz (Germany) (DE), Clausthal University of Technology (DE), Furtwangen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.