How do teachers use digital technology in classrooms? Characterizing mathematics teachers’ teaching practices

• Teachers use technology to practice, present, motivate, or without clear function. • Teachers reveal notable inter-individual differences in teaching practices. • Teachers differ in how they explain content, implement rules, and select materials. • There is considerable variation in integrating digital technology in the classroom. • Some teachers use the full potential of digital technology, while others do less. Digital technology has the potential to improve student learning, especially in mathematics. However, the extent to which students benefit from technology largely depends on how it is integrated into instruction. Nevertheless, little is known about how teachers implement digital technology in the classroom. This study examines how 14 in-service teachers use a digital tool for teaching fractions in 15–20 lessons. We used classroom observation to identify teaching practices, and cluster analysis to group them into teaching approaches. Four main approaches of teaching with digital technology emerged: (i) Practicing , where teachers used various features of the tool to make students practice the learning content, (ii) Presenting , where teachers used the tool predominantly to present the learning content but did not utilize many features, (iii) Motivating Students , where the tool and especially its game-like features were used as a reward for students, and (iv) Low-Guidance , where the teacher did not provide guidance for students how to use the tool. Teaching practices varied between these approaches in several dimensions, for example in how teachers explained the learning content, how they implemented rules, and which learning materials they selected. The findings highlight large variation in integrating even one and the same digital tool in the mathematics classroom. We identified teaching approaches for technology-enhanced learning settings that can inform future research investigating how technology implementation influences student learning. These approaches may also guide the design of professional development programs that support teachers in developing effective strategies for integrating digital technology into their instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Open
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100310
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do teachers use digital technology in classrooms? Characterizing mathematics teachers’ teaching practices

Andreas Obersteiner, Frank Reinhold, Alina Kadluba
Computers and Education Open
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

How do teachers use digital technology in classrooms? Characterizing mathematics teachers’ teaching practices

Andreas Obersteiner, Frank Reinhold, Alina Kadluba
article en

Abstract

• Teachers use technology to practice, present, motivate, or without clear function. • Teachers reveal notable inter-individual differences in teaching practices. • Teachers differ in how they explain content, implement rules, and select materials. • There is considerable variation in integrating digital technology in the classroom. • Some teachers use the full potential of digital technology, while others do less. Digital technology has the potential to improve student learning, especially in mathematics. However, the extent to which students benefit from technology largely depends on how it is integrated into instruction. Nevertheless, little is known about how teachers implement digital technology in the classroom. This study examines how 14 in-service teachers use a digital tool for teaching fractions in 15–20 lessons. We used classroom observation to identify teaching practices, and cluster analysis to group them into teaching approaches. Four main approaches of teaching with digital technology emerged: (i) Practicing , where teachers used various features of the tool to make students practice the learning content, (ii) Presenting , where teachers used the tool predominantly to present the learning content but did not utilize many features, (iii) Motivating Students , where the tool and especially its game-like features were used as a reward for students, and (iv) Low-Guidance , where the teacher did not provide guidance for students how to use the tool. Teaching practices varied between these approaches in several dimensions, for example in how teachers explained the learning content, how they implemented rules, and which learning materials they selected. The findings highlight large variation in integrating even one and the same digital tool in the mathematics classroom. We identified teaching approaches for technology-enhanced learning settings that can inform future research investigating how technology implementation influences student learning. These approaches may also guide the design of professional development programs that support teachers in developing effective strategies for integrating digital technology into their instruction.

Computers and Education OpenVol. 9
University of Education Freiburg (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.