Persistent suicidality: A systematic scoping review of the literature

Background: Suicidality can extend beyond the acute phase and be a long-term condition. Known by various terms, including chronic or persistent suicidality (PS), this phenomenon is well recognized in clinical practice. However, a comprehensive synthesis and evaluation of the literature is missing, leaving the scope and focus of the current scientific evidence on PS unclear. Aims: This review aims to identify and critically appraise the literature on PS. It seeks to provide an overview of how the evidence defines and operationalises PS, its occurrence, and the characteristics of individuals affected by it. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. After preregistration, searches were conducted in six databases: Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC. Articles describing individuals with suicidal ideation or a death wish lasting a year or longer were included. Quality appraisal was performed using the National Institute of Health's quality assessment tools. Due to the pluriformity of the literature a narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: In total, 63 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Around one-third of individuals experience suicidal ideation that persists over the long term. There is a strong overall association between PS and psychiatric or psychological distress. Results suggest that specific variables may help differentiate between individuals with transient suicidal ideation and those at risk for PS. Conclusions: Despite sufficient quality of most studies reporting PS, the field is hindered by inconsistent operationalisations and a lack of study replication. This study highlights the need for a uniform understanding of PS and proposes a provisional definition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100996
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent suicidality: A systematic scoping review of the literature

Mette Palm, Elke Elzinga, Kairi Kõlves, Aartjan T.F. Beekman et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Persistent suicidality: A systematic scoping review of the literature

Mette Palm, Elke Elzinga, Kairi Kõlves, Aartjan T.F. Beekman, Sisco van Veen, Leah Middelkoop, Almar A.L. Kok
article en

Abstract

Background: Suicidality can extend beyond the acute phase and be a long-term condition. Known by various terms, including chronic or persistent suicidality (PS), this phenomenon is well recognized in clinical practice. However, a comprehensive synthesis and evaluation of the literature is missing, leaving the scope and focus of the current scientific evidence on PS unclear. Aims: This review aims to identify and critically appraise the literature on PS. It seeks to provide an overview of how the evidence defines and operationalises PS, its occurrence, and the characteristics of individuals affected by it. Method: A systematic scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. After preregistration, searches were conducted in six databases: Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC. Articles describing individuals with suicidal ideation or a death wish lasting a year or longer were included. Quality appraisal was performed using the National Institute of Health's quality assessment tools. Due to the pluriformity of the literature a narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: In total, 63 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Around one-third of individuals experience suicidal ideation that persists over the long term. There is a strong overall association between PS and psychiatric or psychological distress. Results suggest that specific variables may help differentiate between individuals with transient suicidal ideation and those at risk for PS. Conclusions: Despite sufficient quality of most studies reporting PS, the field is hindered by inconsistent operationalisations and a lack of study replication. This study highlights the need for a uniform understanding of PS and proposes a provisional definition.

Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsVol. 23
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.