Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units

The growing number of patients with multimorbidity and increasing disease complexity presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) poses a global challenge, with overcrowding as a major consequence. To address these pressures, various interdisciplinary short-term monitoring and treatment units, such as Acute Medical Units, Frailty Units, Observation Units, and Chest Pain Units, have been implemented to improve patient flow from presentation to discharge. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the reported effects of these units on patient outcomes and ED crowding. We searched multiple databases and included studies reporting at least one primary outcome measure (length of stay, mortality, costs, readmissions, or staff satisfaction) following implementation of such a unit. The search yielded 2972 results, of which 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported outcomes included reductions in hospital length of stay (0.24 to 6.16 days), cost savings (ranging from €162 to nearly €2 million across eight studies), and stable or decreased mortality in some settings. However, the evidence base is heterogeneous, with units differing substantially in patient populations, aims, and models of care, and cost analyses often relying on limited methods. Consequently, strong general conclusions across all unit types are not possible. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that when well-matched to local system bottlenecks and patient populations, specialized acute care units can improve patient flow and contribute to the accessibility of emergency care without compromising quality.Trial Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A9EF7.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04194-w
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units

Mark E. Haaksma, Marjolein N. T. Kremers, Karin A. H. Kaasjager, Hilde M. Wesselius et al.
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units

Mark E. Haaksma, Marjolein N. T. Kremers, Karin A. H. Kaasjager, Hilde M. Wesselius, Marco Goeijenbier, Suzanne Schol-Gelok, Tobias R. Neijzen, Niels Raaijmakers
article en

Abstract

The growing number of patients with multimorbidity and increasing disease complexity presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) poses a global challenge, with overcrowding as a major consequence. To address these pressures, various interdisciplinary short-term monitoring and treatment units, such as Acute Medical Units, Frailty Units, Observation Units, and Chest Pain Units, have been implemented to improve patient flow from presentation to discharge. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the reported effects of these units on patient outcomes and ED crowding. We searched multiple databases and included studies reporting at least one primary outcome measure (length of stay, mortality, costs, readmissions, or staff satisfaction) following implementation of such a unit. The search yielded 2972 results, of which 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported outcomes included reductions in hospital length of stay (0.24 to 6.16 days), cost savings (ranging from €162 to nearly €2 million across eight studies), and stable or decreased mortality in some settings. However, the evidence base is heterogeneous, with units differing substantially in patient populations, aims, and models of care, and cost analyses often relying on limited methods. Consequently, strong general conclusions across all unit types are not possible. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that when well-matched to local system bottlenecks and patient populations, specialized acute care units can improve patient flow and contribute to the accessibility of emergency care without compromising quality.Trial Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A9EF7.

Internal and Emergency MedicineVol. 21(1)
Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis (NL), St.Jans Gasthuis Weert (NL), Department of Health (TW), IJsselland Ziekenhuis (NL), Spaarne Gasthuis (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.