Validation of the Persian version of anterior skull base questionnaire in patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery

Endoscopic skull base surgery has transformed craniofacial treatment by reducing morbidity and enhancing precision. Traditional outcome measures often overlook the multidimensional aspects of quality of life (QoL) in recovery. Patient-reported tools, such as the anterior skull base questionnaire (ASBQ), offer a comprehensive view of QoL. However, the ASBQ's effectiveness is limited in non-English-speaking populations without cultural adaptation. This study aims to culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the Persian version of the anterior skull base questionnaire (ASBQ-P) for patients undergoing transnasal transsphenoidal surgery. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation adhered to ISPOR guidelines, encompassing forward and backward translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing. Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation with SNOT-22 scores, while responsiveness was evaluated through effect sizes and standardized response means. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05. A total of 36 patients completed the Persian version of the ASBQ and SNOT-22 questionnaires. The ASBQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.936). Test-retest reliability was high, with an ICC of 0.927 for average measures. Convergent validity was supported by a significant moderate negative correlation between ASBQ and SNOT-22 scores (r=-0.544, P = 0.001). A known-groups validity analysis revealed significant differences in ASBQ scores across SNOT-22 severity categories (P = 0.001), supporting the instrument's discriminative capacity. Our findings confirm the Persian ASBQ as a reliable and valid tool for assessing outcomes in anterior skull base surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24989-3
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Persian version of anterior skull base questionnaire in patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery

Mahnaz Pejman Sani, Milad Shafizadeh, Alipasha Meysamie, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh et al.
Scientific Reports
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Validation of the Persian version of anterior skull base questionnaire in patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery

Mahnaz Pejman Sani, Milad Shafizadeh, Alipasha Meysamie, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh, Farhang Rashidi, Manar Abu Abed, Pouria Delbari, Mohammad Rostami Ravari
article en

Abstract

Endoscopic skull base surgery has transformed craniofacial treatment by reducing morbidity and enhancing precision. Traditional outcome measures often overlook the multidimensional aspects of quality of life (QoL) in recovery. Patient-reported tools, such as the anterior skull base questionnaire (ASBQ), offer a comprehensive view of QoL. However, the ASBQ's effectiveness is limited in non-English-speaking populations without cultural adaptation. This study aims to culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the Persian version of the anterior skull base questionnaire (ASBQ-P) for patients undergoing transnasal transsphenoidal surgery. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation adhered to ISPOR guidelines, encompassing forward and backward translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing. Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation with SNOT-22 scores, while responsiveness was evaluated through effect sizes and standardized response means. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05. A total of 36 patients completed the Persian version of the ASBQ and SNOT-22 questionnaires. The ASBQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.936). Test-retest reliability was high, with an ICC of 0.927 for average measures. Convergent validity was supported by a significant moderate negative correlation between ASBQ and SNOT-22 scores (r=-0.544, P = 0.001). A known-groups validity analysis revealed significant differences in ASBQ scores across SNOT-22 severity categories (P = 0.001), supporting the instrument's discriminative capacity. Our findings confirm the Persian ASBQ as a reliable and valid tool for assessing outcomes in anterior skull base surgery.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR), Shariati Hospital (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.