Mitigating carbon leakage under the EU ETS: How does State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs affect firm profits?

Non-global climate policies, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), may suffer from carbon leakage, as firms subject to such policies may experience competitive disadvantages compared to firms operating in more loosely regulated areas. This process may make climate policies ineffective, thus undermining the efforts to fight climate change. Specifically, the EU ETS results in a carbon price that is partly passed through in electricity prices, negatively impacting EU electricity-intensive firms exposed to international competition. To avoid the latter, the EU awards so-called State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs to these firms. We empirically evaluate the extent to which firms obtained windfall profits from this aid in 17 EU countries and the UK between 2014 and 2019. We approximate the amount of aid received by firms based on EU legislation and estimate its effect on firm profits using a fixed effects regression model. Although we find that this policy may have mitigated the carbon leakage risk, we find evidence of over-generosity, with around 22% of beneficiaries possibly gaining windfall profits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109024
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating carbon leakage under the EU ETS: How does State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs affect firm profits?

Michaela Kesina, Machiel Mulder, Carlotta Masciandaro
Energy Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Mitigating carbon leakage under the EU ETS: How does State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs affect firm profits?

Michaela Kesina, Machiel Mulder, Carlotta Masciandaro
article en

Abstract

Non-global climate policies, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), may suffer from carbon leakage, as firms subject to such policies may experience competitive disadvantages compared to firms operating in more loosely regulated areas. This process may make climate policies ineffective, thus undermining the efforts to fight climate change. Specifically, the EU ETS results in a carbon price that is partly passed through in electricity prices, negatively impacting EU electricity-intensive firms exposed to international competition. To avoid the latter, the EU awards so-called State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs to these firms. We empirically evaluate the extent to which firms obtained windfall profits from this aid in 17 EU countries and the UK between 2014 and 2019. We approximate the amount of aid received by firms based on EU legislation and estimate its effect on firm profits using a fixed effects regression model. Although we find that this policy may have mitigated the carbon leakage risk, we find evidence of over-generosity, with around 22% of beneficiaries possibly gaining windfall profits.

Energy EconomicsVol. 153
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mitigating carbon leakage under the EU ETS: How does State Aid for Indirect Emission Costs affect firm profits? — Michaela Kesina, Machiel Mulder, et al. · Energy Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS