Potential waste in evidence synthesis for health screening: a scoping review and call for action

The results of this review highlight potential research waste due to duplication in evidence synthesis efforts. Coordinated action among organizations advising policymakers, such as NSCs, public health agencies, and evidence review bodies may help establish more efficient, collaborative approaches that enable reuse and adaptation across contexts. Such action could include real-time sharing of ongoing reviews, multiregion comprehensive reviews, and the use of stratified analyses to tailor findings to country-specific needs. These strategies should be explored to determine whether organizations can reduce unnecessary duplication, enhance equity, improve the timeliness and relevance of guidance, and redirect resources toward unmet research priorities and other pressing public health challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential waste in evidence synthesis for health screening: a scoping review and call for action

Julia Geppert, Sarah Batson, Christopher Bane, Chris Stinton et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

Potential waste in evidence synthesis for health screening: a scoping review and call for action

Julia Geppert, Sarah Batson, Christopher Bane, Chris Stinton, Matthew J. Randell, Sian Taylor‐Phillips, Michael Powell, Pranshu Mundada, Eleanor Cozens
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The results of this review highlight potential research waste due to duplication in evidence synthesis efforts. Coordinated action among organizations advising policymakers, such as NSCs, public health agencies, and evidence review bodies may help establish more efficient, collaborative approaches that enable reuse and adaptation across contexts. Such action could include real-time sharing of ongoing reviews, multiregion comprehensive reviews, and the use of stratified analyses to tailor findings to country-specific needs. These strategies should be explored to determine whether organizations can reduce unnecessary duplication, enhance equity, improve the timeliness and relevance of guidance, and redirect resources toward unmet research priorities and other pressing public health challenges.

Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 190
Public Health England (GB), University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.