The metallogenic age and geodynamic setting of tin deposits in East Junggar, NW China: Constraints from cassiterite and zircon U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry

• Tin mineralization in East Junggar occurs as porphyry-type, greisen-type, and quartz vein-type deposits. • The mineralization event is precisely dated at ∼305 Ma by cassiterite U-Pb geochronology. • East Junggar experienced A-type granite emplacement at ∼310 Ma in an extensional regime. • The granites were predominantly derived from partial melting of juvenile crustal material. The East Junggar tin metallogenic belt in Northwest China hosts a variety of tin deposits, including Kamusite, Sareshike, Ganliangzi, and Beilekuduke deposits. Zircon U-Pb ages were obtained for the Kamusite (KMST) biotite granite (309.4 ± 1.3 Ma) hosting greisen-type tin mineralization and for the Sareshike (SRSK) alkaline granite (310.7 ± 1.0 Ma) associated with quartz vein-type mineralization, respectively. Cassiterite U-Pb dating of the Sareshike deposit yielded an age of 305.4 ± 1.4 Ma, indicating a slightly later mineralization event compared to the granite crystallization. The granites related to the tin mineralization were characterized by high silica (77.11–85.90 wt%) and alkali (K 2 O + Na 2 O = 4.04–9.23 wt%) contents but low CaO (0.23 wt% on average) and MgO (0.05 wt% on average) contents. The rare earth element (REE) concentrations range from 68.54 × 10 −6 to 231.15 × 10 −6 , with obviously negative δEu values (average of 0.02) in the chondrite-normalized REE patterns. The HFSE enrichment and high FeO t /MgO and (Na 2 O + K 2 O)/CaO ratios, coupled with remarkably low Ba, Sr, and Eu concentrations, collectively indicate an A-type affinity for the granites. Additionally, positive zircon ε Hf(t) values (with a mean of +13.7) indicated that the granite magmas were likely derived from partial melting of juvenile crustal material. Titanium-in-zircon thermometry reveals that the zircon crystallization temperatures decreased from KMST to SRSK granites during mineralization. The KMST granite was inferred to be more hydrous than the SRSK granite with significantly higher Eu/Eu* ratios. Thus, the magma crystallization temperature, oxygen fugacity, and water content probably jointly controlled the diverse mineralization styles of the tin deposits in East Junggar. Additionally, integrating lithological, petrogeochemical, and comparative analyses, the magmatism which produced the A-type granites occurred in an extensional tectonic setting during the late Carboniferous. The genetic model for the Kamusite and Sareshike tin deposits in East Junggar proposed in this study, provides insights into tin prospecting in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106997
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The metallogenic age and geodynamic setting of tin deposits in East Junggar, NW China: Constraints from cassiterite and zircon U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry

Yonggang Feng, Shuo Yang, Jubiao Cen, Ping Li et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

The metallogenic age and geodynamic setting of tin deposits in East Junggar, NW China: Constraints from cassiterite and zircon U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry

Yonggang Feng, Shuo Yang, Jubiao Cen, Ping Li, Tongyang Zhao, Jian Li, Jiaxing Zheng, Jian Jia
article en

Abstract

• Tin mineralization in East Junggar occurs as porphyry-type, greisen-type, and quartz vein-type deposits. • The mineralization event is precisely dated at ∼305 Ma by cassiterite U-Pb geochronology. • East Junggar experienced A-type granite emplacement at ∼310 Ma in an extensional regime. • The granites were predominantly derived from partial melting of juvenile crustal material. The East Junggar tin metallogenic belt in Northwest China hosts a variety of tin deposits, including Kamusite, Sareshike, Ganliangzi, and Beilekuduke deposits. Zircon U-Pb ages were obtained for the Kamusite (KMST) biotite granite (309.4 ± 1.3 Ma) hosting greisen-type tin mineralization and for the Sareshike (SRSK) alkaline granite (310.7 ± 1.0 Ma) associated with quartz vein-type mineralization, respectively. Cassiterite U-Pb dating of the Sareshike deposit yielded an age of 305.4 ± 1.4 Ma, indicating a slightly later mineralization event compared to the granite crystallization. The granites related to the tin mineralization were characterized by high silica (77.11–85.90 wt%) and alkali (K 2 O + Na 2 O = 4.04–9.23 wt%) contents but low CaO (0.23 wt% on average) and MgO (0.05 wt% on average) contents. The rare earth element (REE) concentrations range from 68.54 × 10 −6 to 231.15 × 10 −6 , with obviously negative δEu values (average of 0.02) in the chondrite-normalized REE patterns. The HFSE enrichment and high FeO t /MgO and (Na 2 O + K 2 O)/CaO ratios, coupled with remarkably low Ba, Sr, and Eu concentrations, collectively indicate an A-type affinity for the granites. Additionally, positive zircon ε Hf(t) values (with a mean of +13.7) indicated that the granite magmas were likely derived from partial melting of juvenile crustal material. Titanium-in-zircon thermometry reveals that the zircon crystallization temperatures decreased from KMST to SRSK granites during mineralization. The KMST granite was inferred to be more hydrous than the SRSK granite with significantly higher Eu/Eu* ratios. Thus, the magma crystallization temperature, oxygen fugacity, and water content probably jointly controlled the diverse mineralization styles of the tin deposits in East Junggar. Additionally, integrating lithological, petrogeochemical, and comparative analyses, the magmatism which produced the A-type granites occurred in an extensional tectonic setting during the late Carboniferous. The genetic model for the Kamusite and Sareshike tin deposits in East Junggar proposed in this study, provides insights into tin prospecting in the region.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 187
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Xinjiang Institute of Engineering (CN), Xinjiang Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (CN), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), Guangxi Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.