In-situ surface porosity prediction in hybrid-directed energy deposition (DED) process using explainable multimodal sensor fusion

Porosity remains one of the most critical defects in Directed Energy Deposition (DED), due to the complex thermo-mechanical interactions within the melt pool, directly limiting the reliability of additively manufactured parts. Conventional inspection methods such as X-ray computed tomography scans are expensive, time-consuming, and unsuitable for real-time intervention, while in-situ thermal imaging often lacks the resolution and sensitivity to capture limited pore formation pathways. These limitations highlight the industrial need for real-time, mechanism-aware porosity detection to enable closed-loop quality control, especially in hybrid-DED systems where sequential printing and machining cycles introduce additional complexity. In this study, synchronized multimodal sensing and explainable deep learning are employed to investigate pore formation at sub-millimeter resolution surface elements, referred to as surfels . Acoustic emission (AE), accelerometer, and thermal imaging data were synchronized to 0.1 ms temporal and 0.5 mm spatial resolution during hybrid-DED of 316L stainless steel using an Optomec–LENS® MTS 500 system. Time–frequency features extracted from these signals were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN), which achieved a classification accuracy of 87 % in distinguishing porous from nonporous surfels. Our results indicate that sensor data from the printing cycle are more effective for pore detection than those from machining. Furthermore, explainable AI analysis with local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) revealed that high-frequency AE signatures differentiate lack-of-fusion voids, caused by insufficient inter-track overlap, from spatter-induced porosity. Porous surfels exhibited ∼37 % lower spectral energy in high-frequency AE bands compared to sound regions, while spatter-induced porosity showed ∼27 % higher energy relative to lack-of-fusion voids. These findings demonstrate that the integration of multimodal sensor fusion with explainable AI enhances porosity detection accuracy while uncovering key underlying pore formation mechanisms. The proposed framework offers a practical route towards physics-informed, real-time monitoring and control of hybrid-DED processes, with significant implications for improving build quality and reducing dependence on expensive post-process inspections. • Acoustic Emission (AE) time-frequency patterns reveal two pore modes (spatter-induced and lack-of-fusion) in Hybrid-DED. • AE mapping classifies each 1 mm surface as porous or non-porous with pore-cause identification. • AE signals show strongest pore signatures during Hybrid-DED printing, not machining.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.10.080
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-situ surface porosity prediction in hybrid-directed energy deposition (DED) process using explainable multimodal sensor fusion

Abhishek Hanchate, Adithyaa Karthikeyan, Satish Bukkapatnam, Himanshu Balhara et al.
1 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

In-situ surface porosity prediction in hybrid-directed energy deposition (DED) process using explainable multimodal sensor fusion

Abhishek Hanchate, Adithyaa Karthikeyan, Satish Bukkapatnam, Himanshu Balhara, Andreas K. Lianos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Porosity remains one of the most critical defects in Directed Energy Deposition (DED), due to the complex thermo-mechanical interactions within the melt pool, directly limiting the reliability of additively manufactured parts. Conventional inspection methods such as X-ray computed tomography scans are expensive, time-consuming, and unsuitable for real-time intervention, while in-situ thermal imaging often lacks the resolution and sensitivity to capture limited pore formation pathways. These limitations highlight the industrial need for real-time, mechanism-aware porosity detection to enable closed-loop quality control, especially in hybrid-DED systems where sequential printing and machining cycles introduce additional complexity. In this study, synchronized multimodal sensing and explainable deep learning are employed to investigate pore formation at sub-millimeter resolution surface elements, referred to as surfels . Acoustic emission (AE), accelerometer, and thermal imaging data were synchronized to 0.1 ms temporal and 0.5 mm spatial resolution during hybrid-DED of 316L stainless steel using an Optomec–LENS® MTS 500 system. Time–frequency features extracted from these signals were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN), which achieved a classification accuracy of 87 % in distinguishing porous from nonporous surfels. Our results indicate that sensor data from the printing cycle are more effective for pore detection than those from machining. Furthermore, explainable AI analysis with local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) revealed that high-frequency AE signatures differentiate lack-of-fusion voids, caused by insufficient inter-track overlap, from spatter-induced porosity. Porous surfels exhibited ∼37 % lower spectral energy in high-frequency AE bands compared to sound regions, while spatter-induced porosity showed ∼27 % higher energy relative to lack-of-fusion voids. These findings demonstrate that the integration of multimodal sensor fusion with explainable AI enhances porosity detection accuracy while uncovering key underlying pore formation mechanisms. The proposed framework offers a practical route towards physics-informed, real-time monitoring and control of hybrid-DED processes, with significant implications for improving build quality and reducing dependence on expensive post-process inspections. • Acoustic Emission (AE) time-frequency patterns reveal two pore modes (spatter-induced and lack-of-fusion) in Hybrid-DED. • AE mapping classifies each 1 mm surface as porous or non-porous with pore-cause identification. • AE signals show strongest pore signatures during Hybrid-DED printing, not machining.

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 156
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.