AI-Powered Learning: Revolutionizing Education and Automated Code Evaluation

The paper presents a case study on using artificial intelligence (AI) for preliminary grading of student programming assignments. By integrating our previously introduced learning programming interface Verificator with the Gemini 2.5 large language model via Google AI Studio, C++ student submissions were evaluated automatically and compared with teacher-assigned grades. The results showed moderate to high correlation, although the AI was stricter. The study demonstrates that AI tools can improve grading speed and consistency while highlighting the need for human oversight due to limitations in interpreting non-standard solutions. It also emphasizes ethical considerations such as transparency, bias, and data privacy in educational AI use. A hybrid grading model combining AI efficiency and human judgment is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16111015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Learning: Revolutionizing Education and Automated Code Evaluation

Andrija Bernik, Danijel Radošević, Andrej Čep
1 citations
Information
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.48
article

AI-Powered Learning: Revolutionizing Education and Automated Code Evaluation

Andrija Bernik, Danijel Radošević, Andrej Čep
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a case study on using artificial intelligence (AI) for preliminary grading of student programming assignments. By integrating our previously introduced learning programming interface Verificator with the Gemini 2.5 large language model via Google AI Studio, C++ student submissions were evaluated automatically and compared with teacher-assigned grades. The results showed moderate to high correlation, although the AI was stricter. The study demonstrates that AI tools can improve grading speed and consistency while highlighting the need for human oversight due to limitations in interpreting non-standard solutions. It also emphasizes ethical considerations such as transparency, bias, and data privacy in educational AI use. A hybrid grading model combining AI efficiency and human judgment is recommended.

InformationVol. 16(11)
University of Zagreb (HR), University North (HR), Bioinstitut (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.