Research on Mixing Uniformity Evaluation and Molding Method for Crumb Rubber Asphalt Mixtures

The broader adoption of crumb rubber asphalt mixtures (CRAM) as sustainable pavement materials is currently limited by two key technical barriers. Firstly, there is a lack of standardized methods to evaluate mixing uniformity. Secondly, the material's tendency for elastic recovery after compaction remains problematic. These barriers ultimately hinder the realization of CRAM's full potential in vibration reduction, noise abatement, and resource recycling. To improve the performance evaluation system of CRAM and promote its development in engineering applications. Based on the distribution characteristics of crumb rubber in asphalt mixtures, this study established a crumb rubber distribution area moment model. It proposed a coefficient of area-distance variation to evaluate the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Through compaction tests and orthogonal tests, the effects of mixing process, mixing time, mixing temperature, compaction temperature, compaction times, and compaction method on the mixing uniformity and performance of CRAM are systematically investigated. The results show that, compared with specimens prepared by single compaction and compaction after high-temperature curing, CRAM specimens prepared by secondary compaction exhibit superior mechanical performance. The 24 h elastic recovery rate of these specimens is reduced to 24% of that in single-compacted specimens. The mixing process and mixing time have a significant impact on the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Pre-mixing crumb rubber with aggregates or extending the mixing time can improve the CRAM mixing uniformity by 45% and 18%, respectively. The mixing and compaction temperatures primarily affect the bulk density and Marshall stability of the specimens. When the mixing and compaction temperatures are 180 °C and 170 °C, respectively, the bulk density and Marshall stability of the molded specimens reach their maximum values. Through orthogonal analysis, the optimal mixing method for CRAM is determined as follows: mix aggregates and crumb rubber at 180 °C for 40 s, then add asphalt and continue mixing for another 80 s. The optimal process for secondary compaction is as follows: the first compaction at 170 °C, compacting each side 47 times, and the second compaction at 80 °C, compacting each side 23 times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18225245
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Mixing Uniformity Evaluation and Molding Method for Crumb Rubber Asphalt Mixtures

Lingdi Kong, Guanglei Qu, Yi Lu, Wenhua Wang et al.
Materials
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Research on Mixing Uniformity Evaluation and Molding Method for Crumb Rubber Asphalt Mixtures

Lingdi Kong, Guanglei Qu, Yi Lu, Wenhua Wang, Yilong Li, Mulian Zheng, Chuan Lü, Wei Yan
article en

Abstract

The broader adoption of crumb rubber asphalt mixtures (CRAM) as sustainable pavement materials is currently limited by two key technical barriers. Firstly, there is a lack of standardized methods to evaluate mixing uniformity. Secondly, the material's tendency for elastic recovery after compaction remains problematic. These barriers ultimately hinder the realization of CRAM's full potential in vibration reduction, noise abatement, and resource recycling. To improve the performance evaluation system of CRAM and promote its development in engineering applications. Based on the distribution characteristics of crumb rubber in asphalt mixtures, this study established a crumb rubber distribution area moment model. It proposed a coefficient of area-distance variation to evaluate the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Through compaction tests and orthogonal tests, the effects of mixing process, mixing time, mixing temperature, compaction temperature, compaction times, and compaction method on the mixing uniformity and performance of CRAM are systematically investigated. The results show that, compared with specimens prepared by single compaction and compaction after high-temperature curing, CRAM specimens prepared by secondary compaction exhibit superior mechanical performance. The 24 h elastic recovery rate of these specimens is reduced to 24% of that in single-compacted specimens. The mixing process and mixing time have a significant impact on the mixing uniformity of CRAM. Pre-mixing crumb rubber with aggregates or extending the mixing time can improve the CRAM mixing uniformity by 45% and 18%, respectively. The mixing and compaction temperatures primarily affect the bulk density and Marshall stability of the specimens. When the mixing and compaction temperatures are 180 °C and 170 °C, respectively, the bulk density and Marshall stability of the molded specimens reach their maximum values. Through orthogonal analysis, the optimal mixing method for CRAM is determined as follows: mix aggregates and crumb rubber at 180 °C for 40 s, then add asphalt and continue mixing for another 80 s. The optimal process for secondary compaction is as follows: the first compaction at 170 °C, compacting each side 47 times, and the second compaction at 80 °C, compacting each side 23 times.

MaterialsVol. 18(22)
Beihua University (CN), Qilu University of Technology (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Detection Limit (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.