The Impact of Welfare on Intergroup Relations: Caste-Based Social Insurance and Social Integration in India
Religious and ethnic communities have long helped people cope with risks. Does state-provided welfare substitute for ethnicity-based social insurance? If so, does it improve intergroup relations? Ethnicity-based insurance operates through reciprocity and solidarity, requiring social investment in in-group ties. This limits the formation of out-group ties, exacerbating ethnic divisions. Welfare reduces dependence on the ethnic group, allowing individuals to form productive out-group ties and increasing intergroup integration. I test this argument in caste networks in India. I leverage panel data on household loans to show that an income support program reduced within-caste borrowing by 38.5%. Using survey data from 3,020 households, I show that welfare enhanced intercaste ties, mainly in areas with lower caste-based land inequality. I draw on 56 qualitative interviews to document how caste-based social insurance exacerbates social segregation, and why intercaste ties increase with lower group inequality. These findings illuminate the persistence and demise of ethnic divisions.
Authors
- AKSHAY GOVIND DIXIT (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6166-2523)
Institutions
- Princeton University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Political Science Review
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055425101305
- Primary Topic
- Agricultural risk and resilience
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Harvard University
- Harvard Kennedy School