Consumer Attitudes to Combined Sustainability and Nutrition Labelling of Foods: An Exploratory Study

ABSTRACT To transform our food system to ensure that our diets are simultaneously healthy and sustainable, it is important to ensure that consumer demand and preferences support increased production and availability of sustainable and nutritious foods (the ‘pull’ side of the food system). To facilitate this, consumers need to be provided with information on the nutritional content and environmental impact of foods and meals. The aim of this research was to understand consumer attitudes towards a combined nutrition and sustainability index applied to food labelling and to nutrition and sustainability labelling of foods. Five focus groups were conducted, with 43 consumer participants, which were used to inform the design of interview protocols with 20 consumer participants regarding label design. Participants were selected to represent a mix of gender, age and socio‐economic status within UK samples. Thematic analysis of the results suggested that, although participants broadly supported improved nutrition and sustainability of their food choices, nutrition was prioritised over sustainability (potentially reflecting perceptions of personal and immediate impacts on consumer health, and at the same time indirect, systemic and more remote impacts on the environment associated with food choices). Animal welfare was considered a sustainability issue associated with production. For some less affluent consumers, cost represented a more important determinant of food choices. The use of the combined index was appreciated by participants, but additional information about how the nutrition and environmental impact scores contribute to the combined score, and transparency regarding these calculations, would be needed if the label is to be trusted and understood. It was concluded that consumers value the ability to assess nutrition and the environmental impact of foods and meals using the labels provided, if the contributory components of the combined index are made available within the public domain to ensure transparency regarding how these were calculated. The impact of the index on actual food choices (e.g., when combined with policy measures such as taxation and subsidy policy levers) requires further analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Attitudes to Combined Sustainability and Nutrition Labelling of Foods: An Exploratory Study

Francisco Areal, Beatrice Smyth, Anne P. Nugent, Alysha S Thompson et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Consumer Attitudes to Combined Sustainability and Nutrition Labelling of Foods: An Exploratory Study

Francisco Areal, Beatrice Smyth, Anne P. Nugent, Alysha S Thompson, Lynn J. Frewer, Jayne V. Woodside, Novieta H. Sari, Rao Fu, Jelena Vlajić, Beth Clark, Marian Raley, Paul Brereton, Ransford Teng-viel Karbo, Leona Lindberg, George Hutchinson, Kieran Higgins, David M. Livingstone, Eva‐Leanne Thomas, Orla Collins
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT To transform our food system to ensure that our diets are simultaneously healthy and sustainable, it is important to ensure that consumer demand and preferences support increased production and availability of sustainable and nutritious foods (the ‘pull’ side of the food system). To facilitate this, consumers need to be provided with information on the nutritional content and environmental impact of foods and meals. The aim of this research was to understand consumer attitudes towards a combined nutrition and sustainability index applied to food labelling and to nutrition and sustainability labelling of foods. Five focus groups were conducted, with 43 consumer participants, which were used to inform the design of interview protocols with 20 consumer participants regarding label design. Participants were selected to represent a mix of gender, age and socio‐economic status within UK samples. Thematic analysis of the results suggested that, although participants broadly supported improved nutrition and sustainability of their food choices, nutrition was prioritised over sustainability (potentially reflecting perceptions of personal and immediate impacts on consumer health, and at the same time indirect, systemic and more remote impacts on the environment associated with food choices). Animal welfare was considered a sustainability issue associated with production. For some less affluent consumers, cost represented a more important determinant of food choices. The use of the combined index was appreciated by participants, but additional information about how the nutrition and environmental impact scores contribute to the combined score, and transparency regarding these calculations, would be needed if the label is to be trusted and understood. It was concluded that consumers value the ability to assess nutrition and the environmental impact of foods and meals using the labels provided, if the contributory components of the combined index are made available within the public domain to ensure transparency regarding how these were calculated. The impact of the index on actual food choices (e.g., when combined with policy measures such as taxation and subsidy policy levers) requires further analysis.

International Journal of Consumer StudiesVol. 49(6)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Ulster (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.