Quality assessment of global gravity field models in the Antarctic region based on airborne gravity data

As the largest ice sheet storage area in the world, Antarctica's gravity field characteristics are key data for studying ice sheet mass balance, sea level changes, and polar resource exploration. However, current gravity field modeling in polar regions faces two major challenges: First, the satellite orbital inclination limit (e.g., the GOCE mission has observation gaps within the latitude circle of 83.3°), which causes ill-posed problems in satellite gravity inversion. Although some studies have improved this using methods like Tikhonov regularization and spherical cap regularization, the applicability of different regularization methods in polar regions lacks systematic evaluation. Second, multi-source gravity data have frequency band limitations, and the study of frequency band characteristics in combined gravity models is relatively scarce. To address these issues, this paper utilizes international Antarctic airborne gravity datasets, including AntGG and PolarGap. It systematically evaluates the accuracy of six satellite gravity field models (such as DIR_R6 and GOCO06s) and five combined gravity models (such as EGM2008 and XGM2019e) in Antarctica, from both spatial and spectral perspectives. The study reveals the error distribution characteristics of different models in Antarctica and further quantifies the contribution characteristics of each model in different frequency bands. The results show that global gravity field models exhibit lower quality within the polar gap at the 83.3°S latitude circle, and introducing additional measurement data combined with regularization methods can significantly improve their accuracy. Additionally, among the combined gravity field models, the XGM2019e_2159 model performs best in Antarctica, and the inclusion of satellite altimetry data significantly improves its quality in oceanic regions. The findings of this study will provide experimental references for data selection and gravity field model optimization in Antarctic gravity field research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.08.001
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality assessment of global gravity field models in the Antarctic region based on airborne gravity data

Wei Feng, Qinglu Mu, Meng Yang, Min Zhong et al.
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Quality assessment of global gravity field models in the Antarctic region based on airborne gravity data

Wei Feng, Qinglu Mu, Meng Yang, Min Zhong, X Xiao
article en

Abstract

As the largest ice sheet storage area in the world, Antarctica's gravity field characteristics are key data for studying ice sheet mass balance, sea level changes, and polar resource exploration. However, current gravity field modeling in polar regions faces two major challenges: First, the satellite orbital inclination limit (e.g., the GOCE mission has observation gaps within the latitude circle of 83.3°), which causes ill-posed problems in satellite gravity inversion. Although some studies have improved this using methods like Tikhonov regularization and spherical cap regularization, the applicability of different regularization methods in polar regions lacks systematic evaluation. Second, multi-source gravity data have frequency band limitations, and the study of frequency band characteristics in combined gravity models is relatively scarce. To address these issues, this paper utilizes international Antarctic airborne gravity datasets, including AntGG and PolarGap. It systematically evaluates the accuracy of six satellite gravity field models (such as DIR_R6 and GOCO06s) and five combined gravity models (such as EGM2008 and XGM2019e) in Antarctica, from both spatial and spectral perspectives. The study reveals the error distribution characteristics of different models in Antarctica and further quantifies the contribution characteristics of each model in different frequency bands. The results show that global gravity field models exhibit lower quality within the polar gap at the 83.3°S latitude circle, and introducing additional measurement data combined with regularization methods can significantly improve their accuracy. Additionally, among the combined gravity field models, the XGM2019e_2159 model performs best in Antarctica, and the inclusion of satellite altimetry data significantly improves its quality in oceanic regions. The findings of this study will provide experimental references for data selection and gravity field model optimization in Antarctic gravity field research.

Geodesy and Geodynamics
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.