Measuring mobile health engagement in cancer care: Development and psychometric validation of the CmHEAQ scale

Mobile health (mHealth) applications show promise in cancer care, but sustained patient engagement remains poorly understood due to a lack of validated measurement instruments. Existing tools fail to capture cancer-specific engagement dimensions and multidimensional engagement patterns. We developed the Cancer Mobile Health Engagement and Adherence Questionnaire (CmHEAQ) through a systematic three-phase methodology. Phase 1 involved literature review and expert consultation, identifying six theoretical domains: Initial Adoption, Consistency, Duration, Dropout/Continuation Intent, Treatment & Symptom Management, and Emotional/Support Use. Phase 2 established content validity through expert panel review (n = 10) and face validity via patient cognitive interviews (n = 10), yielding 24 items across six domains. Phase 3 included pilot testing (n = 46) and confirmatory validation (n = 218) in cancer patients using mHealth applications at a tertiary oncology centre in Mysore, India. Psychometric evaluation employed reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CmHEAQ demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. Content validity was exceptional (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.94). Internal consistency reliability was excellent in both pilot (Cronbach's α=0.970) and validation samples (α=0.973), with domain-specific reliability ranging from 0.782 to 0.898. EFA revealed six factors explaining 69.09 % variance (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.91); however, empirical analysis revealed that Initial Adoption and Consistency items loaded together on Factor 1. Confirmatory factor analysis of both the theoretical six-factor and empirically-refined five-factor models showed that the five-factor model (combining Initial Adoption and Consistency into "Engagement Initiation & Maintenance") demonstrated superior fit indices (CFI = 0.903, TLI = 0.889, RMSEA = 0.066 [90 % CI: 0.059–0.073]) compared to the six-factor model (CFI = 0.088, RMSEA = 0.200). All factor loadings ranged from 0.67 to 0.81 (mean = 0.72), demonstrating strong convergent validity. The five-factor structure identified three engagement levels: high engagement (61.5 %), moderate engagement (32.6 %), and low engagement (6.0 %). The CmHEAQ represents the first validated, comprehensive instrument specifically designed to assess multidimensional mHealth engagement in cancer populations across five empirically-derived domains: Engagement Initiation & Maintenance, Duration, Dropout/Continuation Intent, Treatment & Symptom Management, and Emotional/Support Use. The scale enables standardised measurement for research and clinical practice. • First validated cancer-specific mHealth engagement scale with 24 items across 6 domains. • Exceptional reliability (Cronbach's α=0.973) and content validity (S-CVI=0.94). • Identifies high, moderate, and low engagement patterns in cancer patients. • Multidimensional assessment captures adoption, consistency, and clinical use. • Enables standardised measurement for mHealth intervention research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring mobile health engagement in cancer care: Development and psychometric validation of the CmHEAQ scale

Deepika Yadav, Arun Gopi, Vanishri Arun, M. Rakesh et al.
1 citations
Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
article

Measuring mobile health engagement in cancer care: Development and psychometric validation of the CmHEAQ scale

Deepika Yadav, Arun Gopi, Vanishri Arun, M. Rakesh, Kiran PK, G Hari Prakash, D. Sunil Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) applications show promise in cancer care, but sustained patient engagement remains poorly understood due to a lack of validated measurement instruments. Existing tools fail to capture cancer-specific engagement dimensions and multidimensional engagement patterns. We developed the Cancer Mobile Health Engagement and Adherence Questionnaire (CmHEAQ) through a systematic three-phase methodology. Phase 1 involved literature review and expert consultation, identifying six theoretical domains: Initial Adoption, Consistency, Duration, Dropout/Continuation Intent, Treatment & Symptom Management, and Emotional/Support Use. Phase 2 established content validity through expert panel review (n = 10) and face validity via patient cognitive interviews (n = 10), yielding 24 items across six domains. Phase 3 included pilot testing (n = 46) and confirmatory validation (n = 218) in cancer patients using mHealth applications at a tertiary oncology centre in Mysore, India. Psychometric evaluation employed reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CmHEAQ demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. Content validity was exceptional (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.94). Internal consistency reliability was excellent in both pilot (Cronbach's α=0.970) and validation samples (α=0.973), with domain-specific reliability ranging from 0.782 to 0.898. EFA revealed six factors explaining 69.09 % variance (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.91); however, empirical analysis revealed that Initial Adoption and Consistency items loaded together on Factor 1. Confirmatory factor analysis of both the theoretical six-factor and empirically-refined five-factor models showed that the five-factor model (combining Initial Adoption and Consistency into "Engagement Initiation & Maintenance") demonstrated superior fit indices (CFI = 0.903, TLI = 0.889, RMSEA = 0.066 [90 % CI: 0.059–0.073]) compared to the six-factor model (CFI = 0.088, RMSEA = 0.200). All factor loadings ranged from 0.67 to 0.81 (mean = 0.72), demonstrating strong convergent validity. The five-factor structure identified three engagement levels: high engagement (61.5 %), moderate engagement (32.6 %), and low engagement (6.0 %). The CmHEAQ represents the first validated, comprehensive instrument specifically designed to assess multidimensional mHealth engagement in cancer populations across five empirically-derived domains: Engagement Initiation & Maintenance, Duration, Dropout/Continuation Intent, Treatment & Symptom Management, and Emotional/Support Use. The scale enables standardised measurement for research and clinical practice. • First validated cancer-specific mHealth engagement scale with 24 items across 6 domains. • Exceptional reliability (Cronbach's α=0.973) and content validity (S-CVI=0.94). • Identifies high, moderate, and low engagement patterns in cancer patients. • Multidimensional assessment captures adoption, consistency, and clinical use. • Enables standardised measurement for mHealth intervention research and practice.

Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer CareVol. 3
JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences (IN), National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.